IVA under the surface

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
18 posts Page 2 of 2
 
 

rockstarloz

User avatar
Posts: 151
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:53 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by rockstarloz » Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:34 pm
Sorry Skippy of course you decided br was the way for you.
 
 

Skippy

User avatar
Posts: 20720
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 6:08 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Skippy » Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:34 pm
I ended up going bankrupt. I spoke to my IP and said I needed another £200 a month to survive and he said it wasn't possible to put a variation forward and he recommended I went BR. I was scared to death at the time, but now I'm glad I did it.
 
 

go_4_broke

User avatar
Posts: 427
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:12 am
Location:

Post by go_4_broke » Sat Nov 08, 2008 5:52 pm
Historically the role of the IP has been primarily act for creditors.

In pre-IVA days a main role of the IP was (and still is) to act as a trustee in bankruptcy, or in other words to secure your assets and sell them off for the benefit of your creditors.

In an IVA they wear two hats. The first one is to act as proposer/nominee for the IVA where they are acting principally for you to secure the IVA.

Once the IVA is in place the situation reverses and they put on the 'supervisors' hat, reverting to a more 'traditional' IP role. They are then acting mainly on behalf of the creditors to police the IVA, ensure you make the payments and stick by the IVA rules.

Clearly there are IP's who take a more balanced view and I think most of them post on this forum, so present company excepted as they say.

However if you bear in mind the basic structure and history, it does seem to account for a lot of the problems people see hereabouts.
Please view my blog at www.go4broke.blogs.iva.co.uk

'Vive la differentness'
18 posts Page 2 of 2
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”