Who gets what from PPI claim ? How much is eventually left for my creditors ?

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
14 posts Page 1 of 1
 
 

Gary.51

User avatar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:04 pm

Post by Gary.51 » Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:04 pm
I'm in an IVA with Payplan who has asked Credo Claims to handle any PPI claims I might have. Credo charges a 40% fee, which is a lot.

How much of this will they pay to Payplan as an Introducer Fee?

Isn't Payplan obliged to declare any introducer fees?

Isn't this fee supposed to be paid into the IVA as an asset of the estate?

Will Payplan then take a % of both the remaining PPI claim AND a % of the Introducer fee, as part of their normal Supervisory fees?

Where does all the cash from the claim actually fall to earth - who gets what, and how much is eventually left for my creditors?
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:13 pm
The claims company gets a cut of the claim and there is no introducer fee involved.

They usually get the agreed percentage of the whole refund, so, for ease of maths, say the refund is £1000. In this case the claims company get £400.

So £600 is payable into the IVA estate, of which ( in most cases these days) the IP gets the agreed 15% - £90.

Of the original £1000 the creditors will see £510.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

Gary.51

User avatar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:04 pm

Post by Gary.51 » Tue Apr 14, 2015 3:56 pm
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by Foggy

The claims company gets a cut of the claim and there is no introducer fee involved.

They usually get the agreed percentage of the whole refund, so, for ease of maths, say the refund is £1000. In this case the claims company get £400.
Thanks Foggy

Do you know for a fact that no introducer fee is involved?

Why would an IVA company choose a Claims company that charges 40% when there are plenty that charge 25% or less? (Suspicion: because they're getting a kickback from the Claims company)

That aside, I now understand Credo Claims and Payplan have strong ties - a shareholder of Payplan's parent (Totemic Ltd) is also a director in Credo. Another reason for choosing the more expensive company at cost to my creditors!
 
 

relieved33

User avatar
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 7:22 pm
Location:

Post by relieved33 » Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:30 pm
Try not to get hung up on fees, as you say it's at a cost to your creditors. If they want to challenge it, they will.
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:00 pm
Gary --- if an introducer fee is paid the IP HAS to declare this in the accounts -- at risk of losing his licence to practice.

You have probably hit the nail on the head when you mention that these high fee charging claims firms are often closely linked with the IP firm. However, that is a matter for the creditors to challenge as it is they who agree these fees, not us.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

Gary.51

User avatar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:04 pm

Post by Gary.51 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:46 am
Are IPs banned from accepting introducer fees then?
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Thu Apr 16, 2015 7:48 am
Not banned -- but if paid they are supposed to be accounted for and, I believe, are part of the IVA estate.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

Gary.51

User avatar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:04 pm

Post by Gary.51 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:24 pm
The whole business stinks if you ask me.

Looking round this forum, claims companies like EIF and EIC (who are NOT linked to any specific IVA firms) are charging up to 40% to handle PPI claims.

The Insolvency Practitioners Association allows commissions to be received for PPI introductions so long as they are disclosed and treated as an asset of the estate: http://www.insolvency-practitioners.org ... _final.pdf

40% fees hurt IVA Creditors and Debtors, because less money is left to reduce debts. The biggest winners are the claim companies and the IP firms who divvy up the 40% fee between them.

The IP firm then takes a further cut for its role in distributing assets.

Why are creditors allowing this? Why are regulators not clamping down on it?
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:08 pm
Gary, try not to let this give you ulcers :-)

You ask why the creditors are content to part with 40% of the PPI fee --- by the same token we could ask why the creditors are content to write off half our debts to them.

Ask not why, but be grateful they do.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

Gary.51

User avatar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:04 pm

Post by Gary.51 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:39 pm
Foggy, the creditors are happy to write off 50% of our debts, because 50% of something is better than 100% of nothing.

But forget the creditors' motivations - the poor old debtors (like me) suffer when 40% is taken from our PPI refunds, because less cash is then available to reduce our outstanding debt.

I could settle my IVA more quickly if Payplan only allowed Credo Claims (or another CMC) to charge 25% - the market rate for the job.

I notice Payplan used to comment regularly on this forum, but I guess their current business model (with Credo) has pushed them to the moral low-ground now - anyone from Payplan wish to comment and prove me wrong?

Anyone else experiencing 40% fees on their PPI claims?
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:52 pm
Are you paying 100% of your original debt plus fees and statutory interest ? THEN it could have a direct impact on you and until then the IVA term will not be reduced.

The most often mentioned fees are around 35%. To my mind even 25% would be exhorbitant for something you can do yourself for a few stamps --- but then .... it's not my money !
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

Gary.51

User avatar
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:04 pm

Post by Gary.51 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 1:09 pm
No, I'm paying more like 55% of my original debt.

Are you saying that my PPI claim has no impact on my IVA, because however much goes to my creditors, it's treated as a windfall effectively?

So, I pay £325 a month for 60 months, into my IVA WITHOUT a PPI claim.

Credo wins my PPI claim, let's say £3,000. £1800 (60%), minus Payplan's cut, is distributed to my creditors. I get nothing directly, and still pay £325 a month for 60 months?
 
 

lifenoteasy

User avatar
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:26 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by lifenoteasy » Fri Apr 17, 2015 1:17 pm
Yep - best idea is treat it as totally irrelevant to you and only relevant to the IP unless it puts you over full repayment of debts plus interest etc.

My thoughts on PPI are not really repeatable.
IVA started March 2011, Completed March 2016 and certificate issued 11 days after final payment. It was not always easy but then some of the best decisions aren't.
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Fri Apr 17, 2015 1:20 pm
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by Gary.51

No, I'm paying more like 55% of my original debt.

Are you saying that my PPI claim has no impact on my IVA, because however much goes to my creditors, it's treated as a windfall effectively?

So, I pay £325 a month for 60 months, into my IVA WITHOUT a PPI claim.

Credo wins my PPI claim, let's say £3,000. £1800 (60%), minus Payplan's cut, is distributed to my creditors. I get nothing directly, and still pay £325 a month for 60 months?
Yes, Gary, that is exactly the position. The object of an IVA is to pay back as much as is affordably possible. You have expenditure agreed -- what's left is the IVA payment ... if this is increased through overtime, bonus payments and the like, 50% goes to the IVA. If you win the lottery, get an inheritance a tax refund or PPI refund ( usually over £500) the lot goes into the IVA until you hit that 100% plus fees and interest.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
14 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”