What would happen if I handed back 5 properties in negative equity ?

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
5 posts Page 1 of 1
 
 

Brian.01

User avatar
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 2:11 pm

Post by Brian.01 » Sat Oct 08, 2016 2:11 pm
I have a number of personal loans and credit cards which are becoming unsustainable and I am considering my options. I also have 10 buy to let properties, 5 of which would be breaking even and 5 in negative equity, the 5 in negative I would also like to hand back. I have read extensively through other websites and posts on this website but can't get actual clarity on what would happen if I were to hand back the 5 properties. Some advice has stated that when the secured lenders are advised on the IVA they are not included because they are 'secured' and that they would be asked to 'rely on their security', by doing this the properties could be handed back with no further recourse on myself. Other advice has stated that they have the right to chase shortfall debt thereafter. Can someone please clarify?
 
 

kallis3

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 77167
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by kallis3 » Sat Oct 08, 2016 2:56 pm
Hi and welcome,

Have no idea on this one I'm afraid. Have you actually spoken to an IP company?
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt
The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.
Bob Marley.
http://kallis3.blogs.iva.co.uk
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Sat Oct 08, 2016 3:46 pm
If a loan is secured then it is not included in the IVA as such, but the repayments allowed for in expenditure. When a property is handed back ( or repossessed if the creditors so wishes) any shortfall is then an unsecured loan and will be included in the IVA, assuming this has been agreed / allowed for at the outset. If not agreed the inclusion of the now unsecured loans could upset the balance of the IVA by unduly lowering the dividend and the IVA could be failed.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Sun Oct 09, 2016 9:49 pm
This is actually quite common and a way to tidy up a portfolio. The bad properties go back and the shortfalls included whereas the good ones are kept. The profits from the good ones help fund the IVA and equity can be addressed later.
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com
 
 

Lisa Thomas

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 7759
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2014 10:26 am

Post by Lisa Thomas » Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:38 am
Ignoring the negative equity part, do the rental payments cover the mortgages and expenses?

You might be able to retain them in an IVA and eventually come out the other side having been able to keep them.
I'm a licensed IP with 16+ yrs at Neville & Co covering the South West area. I have a YouTube channel with advisory videos on here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMPTTu ... Z5k9ZcC2MA http://www.nevilleco.co.uk 01752 786800 Lisa@nevilleco.co.uk
5 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”