Is it correct that I have lost 50% of my pay rise ?

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
11 posts Page 1 of 1
 
 

Stephen.03

User avatar
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 3:38 pm

Post by Stephen.03 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:14 am
I received a £300pm payrise after tax, I informed my IVA company who explained the 10% the %0% rule which was fine by me, now after our yearly review we have now lost the 50% of the payrise, is this correct?
 
 

ginger323232

User avatar
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:31 pm
Location:

Post by ginger323232 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:57 am
Yes - check your proposal, it should explain how things work regarding overtime and pay rises
 
 

watzki

User avatar
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 6:52 pm
Location:

Post by watzki » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:07 am
Are you saying you have lost your 50% of the payrise?if this is so you need to contact your company and explain this,as it is your iva you need to keep a check on it,the iva company will take as much as they can and if you don't challenge their decisions they will take it
Today 1st of December 2016 the vultures finally flew away
 
 

kallis3

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 77167
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by kallis3 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:40 am
Has your I&E altered at all - that might explain it but you do need to check.
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt
The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.
Bob Marley.
http://kallis3.blogs.iva.co.uk
 
 

ginger323232

User avatar
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:31 pm
Location:

Post by ginger323232 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:44 am
Doesnt the 10 % rule applied to overtime - and pay rises are deal usually at the end of the year ? - if this is the case then this sound correct. The the OP should check his own proposal/own IVA company to find out his own position
 
 

kallis3

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 77167
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by kallis3 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:31 am
I believe you are right ginger - payrises are different to bonuses and overtime.
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt
The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.
Bob Marley.
http://kallis3.blogs.iva.co.uk
 
 

luluj

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 11333
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:54 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by luluj » Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:43 am
I agree with ginger .. util your annual review then10% 50 50 goes then after the review 50% of your payrise is taken to give creditors a higher return. However ensure any additional expenditure is captured under your review.
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt

There is a solution for everyone .... Just need to stay positive !

Look at my blog "All I wanted was a baby"
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:30 am
My understanding -- and the way my IP's (both) worked a payrise was that I kept it ALL until the annual review. No 10% 50/50 applies as it is irrelevant. After the annual review the pay increase was then taken into account in that 50% of the net increase was payable into the IVA. This is how it is detailed in my agreement, which was 2010 Protocol.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:55 pm
It sounds correct to me but the uplift should be 50% after allowing for any increases in the cost of living and done at the review time.
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com
 
 

Lisa Thomas

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 7759
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2014 10:26 am

Post by Lisa Thomas » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:42 am
You say you were fine with the 10/50/50 rule - this is what has now happened and is correct.
I'm a licensed IP with 16+ yrs at Neville & Co covering the South West area. I have a YouTube channel with advisory videos on here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMPTTu ... Z5k9ZcC2MA http://www.nevilleco.co.uk 01752 786800 Lisa@nevilleco.co.uk
 
 

size5

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 3104
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:22 pm

Post by size5 » Tue Oct 25, 2016 7:50 pm
You can look at these things negatively, or you can embrace the positive.

For someone seeking the legal protection and all the advantages of an IVA, then it is to be realised that an I.P. will only ask you for what you can realistically afford, i.e income less reasonable outgoings. If the same were applied at annual review time, then all extra would have to go into the pot.

So, someone paying £200 and due to a pay rise affordability rises to £400, the payment rises only to £300. The debtor is clearly better off, as are creditors. It seems like a very fair deal to me, and the bonus/overtime rule is another one that works in a debtors favour. You will always be better off in an IVA by being better off, but you do have to meet creditors halfway.

Hope that makes sense.

Regards.
Cert DR
23+ years in debt advice
I do not post for anyone other than myself

Follow my tweets at http://twitter.com/debtmastersize5
11 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”