Extra income / earnings

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
36 posts Page 1 of 3
 
 

MARK1882

User avatar
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:30 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MARK1882 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:45 pm
Hello all this may take some explaining so bare with me.
On my original proposal my earnings were £1500 per month.
From this I could earn an extra £150 before paying in any extra to the iva. ie 10% rule.

Two years later my income is £1600 but my payment remains the same due to increase in expenditure.However, I am still only able to earn £1650 before paying in any extra income. Should it not be 10% of the new earnings.

Still confused. Any help welcome.[?][?]
Keep smiling. It could be worse.
 
 

luluj

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 11333
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:54 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by luluj » Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:49 pm
I know how you feel as it was always a bone of contention when in our IVA as we were always told it was based on the original earnings despite increased costs......I think your own IP needs to give you the clarification needed for you on this.
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt

There is a solution for everyone .... Just need to stay positive !

Look at my blog "All I wanted was a baby"
 
 

MARK1882

User avatar
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:30 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MARK1882 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:01 pm
Thanks. I have asked the question and was told it is based on original proposal. However, if it get a payrise next year of say £50 that will take me to £1650. This then means there will be no 10% rule at all. CAN THAT BE RIGHT?
Keep smiling. It could be worse.
 
 

MikeyM

User avatar
Posts: 315
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 4:36 pm
Location:

Post by MikeyM » Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:21 pm
The monthly annual overtime/bonus clauses do seem a bit inequitable. In my case I am just going through the IVA proposal process and as I understand it because my bonus is paid annually rather than monthly then I will have to turn over under the 10/50/50 rule.i.e My annual bonus is about £1900 net per annum about 158 per month. If I was paid the bonus monthly I could keep it all as its well below 10% of my monhtly income. However as it is I will have to pay £855 into the IVA. i.e 1900-190(10%)=1710 split 50/50 = 855. Might not seem fair but I suppose if all goes well my creditors will be writing off about 55% of what I owe them.
Last edited by MikeyM on Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
 

Broke of London

User avatar
Posts: 7761
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Broke of London » Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:49 pm
Hi Mikey - I know how you feel. I'm penalised for receiving an annual rather than monthly bonus too. My 10% disregard has changed with salary increases though so it is always 10% of my current salary.
 
 

lem

User avatar
Posts: 2753
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:56 am
Location:

Post by lem » Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:28 pm
That seems very odd, my pay increased in March and at our review in July they have calculated the 10% extra I can earn on my new pay not what was in the original proposal, I would question them again on these and see what it says in your proposal
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:18 am
It should not be based on original earnings - the new base salary should be calculated at each annual review.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

MARK1882

User avatar
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:30 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MARK1882 » Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:41 am
Good news, all has been sorted this morning. The friendly case manager sorted for me. Cannot thank him enough.
Keep smiling. It could be worse.
 
 

Adam Davies

User avatar
Posts: 14596
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:21 pm
Location:

Post by Adam Davies » Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:54 am
Hi

Their mistake so it's a good job that it has been sorted

Regards
Andam Davies
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Sat Oct 13, 2012 12:10 am
I sometimes wonder how many other mistakes might go unnoticed without the assistance provided by this forum.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Shining

User avatar
Posts: 27019
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:57 am
Location:

Post by Shining » Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:40 am
I feel with the help of the professionals some things that are highlighted do get sorted as we as persons in an IVA know what to say to the staff of the IP company which in turn helps sorts things quicker. x
IVA final payment left the bank on the 26th January 2013...looking forward to a debt free future.
 
 

MARK1882

User avatar
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:30 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MARK1882 » Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:46 pm
Hello not posted for a while. Anyway the issue above has raised its head again. Can anyone advise if the statement below is correct as that is what my case manager is telling me.


Additional income is not based on your monthly salary it is calculated using your salary amount at the time of your initial/variation meeting and it will change if your outgoings increase/decrease.

I do not agree with this. I
Keep smiling. It could be worse.
 
 

MARK1882

User avatar
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:30 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MARK1882 » Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:58 pm
To simplify matters my income is £2200 with an Iva payment of £529. They are telling me anything over £2199 has to have 50% paid over. I think it should be anything over £2420. Any advice appreciated.
Keep smiling. It could be worse.
 
 

lifenoteasy

User avatar
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:26 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by lifenoteasy » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:19 pm
It cant be that way because you are not then paying over 50% - you are paying more.
IVA started March 2011, Completed March 2016 and certificate issued 11 days after final payment. It was not always easy but then some of the best decisions aren't.
 
 

MARK1882

User avatar
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:30 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MARK1882 » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:23 pm
The case adviser is adamant she is correct. I am sure she is wrong.
Keep smiling. It could be worse.
36 posts Page 1 of 3
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”