IVA Annual Review

19 posts Page 2 of 2
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:26 pm
Honesty is most definately the best policy.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Max

User avatar
Posts: 2789
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:44 pm
Location:

Post by Max » Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:34 pm
Melanie,would you answer a question for my husband please? He thinks that IPs are in a similar position to solicitors in that they are Officers of the Court and that are obliged to inform the Court if blatant dishonesty comes to light in an IVA. Is he right please?
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:43 pm
Well we are definately officers of the Court, in that the protection from creditors actually comes from Court, but the reporting of blatant dishonesty is more one to report to creditors. If the dishonesty was serious enough, and creditors wished the Supervisor to petition for the person's bankruptcy, then the subsequent Trustee (which could end up being the previous Supervisor) is definately an officer of the Court with wide ranging powers to investigate the matter and seek to recover assets for the benefit of creditors.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Max

User avatar
Posts: 2789
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:44 pm
Location:

Post by Max » Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:45 pm
Thank you - honesty is certainly the best policy! J
19 posts Page 2 of 2
Return to “postings for august”