MelanieGiles wrote:
It is difficult to advise you without the full facts, or details of your current and future income and expenditure.
If you have no intention of paying the secured loan after bankruptcy, then after three months missed payments they are likely to commence possession proceedings against you.
Have you worked out a future budget for when you do move into rented - and would this then leave you with disposable income to fund either an IVA or a DMP?
Thanks all.
Melanie, we would only not pay the F+ loan if we went bankrupt. It seems strange to go through BR and leave the biggest part of the debt namely the F+Loan.
The reason I ask is that the IVA Adviser indicated that neither party may be interested in forcing a sale because both would lose too much. He thought they may leave it for say 3 years for equity to build up. He wasn't clear with the implications for us though and whether we would need to continue paying the full F+ loan. Understandably there are a lot of unknowns. If there was a chance we could stay in the house then we would always prefer this. The IVA Adviser did mention that selling house and then renting lower would improve our income to mortgage ratio but he said in our particular case (level of debt), as an IVA adviser, our best option is BR. He mentioned needing an income to mortgage ration of 35-40. Do you think this may be a viable option.
I don't think we would need to default for three consecutive months on the mortgage or First Plus loan for the rent and BR cost. So they wouldn't start repossession, or would they?
My concern with renting first is that the OR may say we have rented too high and tell us to move again, to a cheaper place.
Renting can be expensive here due to the excess demand for property as a result of the flooding.