First post here....
I am currently in an IVA with Aperture (formally Debt Free Direct), which has been an absolute nightmare.. but that's another story. It seem as though they have no idea which way is up and Aperture is completely snowed under with cases that they can't manage, what a joke.
Anyway, I have just asked a claims management company (yes i know), to look into whether I can claim anything back from the PayDay loans that are in the IVA. I have a couple with QuickQuid and MrLender, as well as Provident.
Do you think this money will come back to me (if I am successful in making a claim) or go to the IP like my PPI claims did? I also did a PBA claim, and the money came to me and as it was under £500 my IP miraculously let me keep it.
Please note that when answering, these payday loans are in the IVA, I do owe money on them (ie, they weren't cleared) - however I have been told that as I am in an IVA they don't have a right to offset it against their own debt, so I won't get stung for fees.
I am surprised you got the PBA claim. Either your IP incorrectly treated it as a windfall or he / she is one of the very few that do allow the first £500 of PPI claims and similar to be retained.
Offsetting -- they are not supposed to do it, but some creditors do and they get away with it. So you could end up with a bill for the claims company bill. They could also send the whole defund to Aperture (which is common practice) and, again, you will get the bill for fees.
Thanks for your message.
Ok. Is there any actual rule if the payday loan company choses to keep the money and offset against the amount that I owed them? I had numerous loans, it was only the last couple I got into trouble with.
What is in an IVA that says that they can't just keep the money? Is there a specific paragraph about it in my creditors meeting or proposal?
I would like to be able to stand my ground if this happens. I have already employed the claims company now, so need to be prepared if it goes belly up I guess!
Heres to hoping.
The only arguement you can use -- and really it should be your IP fighting this --- is that the creditors have agreed and are bound by the IVA not to follow up any enforcement or collection action outside of the IVA. To my mind, any creditor that goes against this by off setting should be sanctioned by the IP and the dividends re-calculated to address the balance. The PPI / whatever belongs to all creditors on a pro-rata basis and they are depriving their fellow creditors of their shares.
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Poethebald and 33 guests
Ask the IVA Experts a QuestionSimply complete form and you will get an answer from our IVA Experts (multiple replies within an hour *)
* Any use of this forum is conditional on you having read and agreed to our terms and conditions.
* If you enter your phone number, Vincent Bond and Co Ltd will give you a courtesy call to ensure that your question has been answered.
* The question will be posted on our forum, we will email you the location