Page 1 of 3

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:54 am
by stoneyB
My proposal has just been rejected. So far the IP's clerk has only said that the Insolvency Exchange who act for three creditors rejected the I&E (although this was within guidelines)She said she would get back to them as it seemed vague. Four creditors that represent 65% of the debt didn't vote at all. She wouldn't speculate with me as to why the I&E was rejected. I am at the end of my tether. Is it normal for there to be so little information about?

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:20 am
by flumpy dog
hey stoney sorry to hear that. keep posting hun an expert will be along soon-hope youre ok x

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:20 am
by MelanieGiles
Your IP needs to check why this has been rejected, as The Insolvency Exchange rarely do reject in my experience, and the other creditors also need to be chased up. Your IP can adjourn proceedings for up to 14 days, so I am sure this will be sorted out for you soon.

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:40 am
by Michael Peoples
Melanie is right. Your IP should certainly be fighting your corner and answering any queries raised by TIX. Hopefully it will all be sorted out before the 14 days are up. Good luck.

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:48 am
by kallis3
Stoneyb, I'm sorry to hear that. I hope your IP manages to get it sorted in your favour.

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:21 pm
by stoneyB
I thought it would be a simple case of them not agreeing certain items not a flat refusal. Are there any other reasons they could reject other than the expenses?

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:46 pm
by Michael Peoples
Creditors may reject because the background story does not justify the debts, the debts may be recent, the income & expenditure account is excessive and they do not believe that the debtor is making their best offer etc. There are numerous reasons but they will tell the IP why and give him/her a chance to come back with more information or an improved offer.

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:30 pm
by stoneyB
I thought that was the point of the creditors meeting to iron out these type of objections and that is why I'm so concerned. I'll just have to wait..............

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:32 pm
by MelanieGiles
Was your proposal put forward in accordance with the IVA protocol, and which IP firm are you with?

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 2:08 pm
by stoneyB
I'm sure it was. I'm with tenon.

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 2:10 pm
by MelanieGiles
Then your creditors have to give you reasons for their rejection, and your IP ought to be on the ball with this right now and be able to give you a definitive answer. I suggest that you give them a call to find out why the proposal has been rejected, and then let us know. I am very curious!

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 2:42 pm
by Michael Peoples
What was the original date of the creditors' meeting and have you received a Chairman's report stating that the proposal has been rejected?

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:39 pm
by stoneyB
Just a few points on the expenditure that we had discussed and was I willing to give up on a few weeks ago. No corporate memory! Hopefully will be agreed and we can proceed. Another 100 grey hairs today!

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 2:50 am
by David Mond
One of Tenons IP's sit on the Board of the DRF so I will forward a copy of this post to her to see whether this matter can be sorted - I am sure it can be. Don't worry I am on to it for you.

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:28 am
by MelanieGiles
If your expenditure is widely far from CCCS guidelines, without satisfactory explanation for the reasons behind this, then I can see why creditors would reject.