Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:22 pm
by Andy101
Hi all,
Could you tell me what happens when an IP breaches an agreement?
My proposal states that the IP should inform 1 week before the IVA is due to finish that he intends to extend it. My finish date was months ago but he is saying it is still open, despite the fact that he hasn't notified me.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:24 pm
by Andy101
It was a full and final IVA that was due to last 2 Months.
No, the IP isn't saying the've informed me.
It wasn't the IP himself I've spoken to, just one of the administrators.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:00 pm
by MelanieGiles
Why does he need to extend the IVA if it was only set to run over 12 months?
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:01 pm
by Andy101
I was hoping to have a chat here before approaching the IP. If any of the experts could comment, that would be great.
My belief is that it's a full and final but it doesn't use that term in the IVA. It just says that I intend to make a one off payment, not sure if thats the same thing.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:04 pm
by MelanieGiles
A "one-off" payment based IVA is often referred to as a full and final. But running an arrangement for just two months is a brave decision on the part of your IP - as it does not give much time for claims to be agreed and paid.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:04 pm
by Andy101
Hi Mel,
Nice to talk to you again
They have extended it because the revenue can't give a final figure for their claim until they receive the 2009/10 tax return.
The IVA was only supposed to be 2 months but according the the revenue, that is impossible.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:08 pm
by MelanieGiles
Aha - I remember your case now. It is unworkable to put forward a 2 month proposal knowing there is a HMRC claim to agree. There is no way to buck this system I am afraid, and for self-employed persons it makes the idea of a quick settlement almost impossible.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:09 pm
by Andy101
The IP did have the money from my friend within 2 weeks of the creditors meeting.
My question though, is can he extend the term without telling me and if not, what happens?
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:10 pm
by MelanieGiles
It depends upon the terms of your IVA - I find it unusual that he would need to give you notice, but it depends upon the terms written into the proposal. If it says he should do, and he hasn't, that is a breach on his part - but what motivation is there to make an issue of this? The IPs hands are tied up with HMRC rulings, and a complaint is not likely to achieve anything.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:18 pm
by Andy101
My proposal refers back to the standard conditions produced by the IVA forum (not sure if you know them). para 5(1) states that any extension notice must be sent 7 days before the end of the IVA.
The reason this is a pain is because there are clauses that cover windfalls and earnings while the IVA is open. I haven't had either so far but I might between now and next April. The whole point of the full and final was that I would be free to move on once the payment was made, now I find myself almost as stressed as I was before the IVA.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:08 pm
by MelanieGiles
This should have been discussed with you prior to the IVA commencing, as every good IP will know that the HMRC claim will take time to agree. If the IVA is deemed to have failed, because proper notice has not been given - you will be back to square one and the IP cannot close the IVA with an unagreed claim.
This is unfortunate, but the way I would look at it is that if you do get a windfall in th meantime, your creditors will end up getting paid more - which I am sure was the intention when you borrowed the money in the first place.
Make sure you submit that 09/10 tax return as soon as you can, but don't be suprised if it doesn't take another few months for the claim to be agreed.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:09 pm
by MelanieGiles
This should have been discussed with you prior to the IVA commencing, as every good IP will know that the HMRC claim will take time to agree. If the IVA is deemed to have failed, because proper notice has not been given - you will be back to square one and the IP cannot close the IVA with an unagreed claim.
This is unfortunate, but the way I would look at it is that if you do get a windfall in th meantime, your creditors will end up getting paid more - which I am sure was the intention when you borrowed the money in the first place.
Make sure you submit that 09/10 tax return as soon as you can, but don't be suprised if it doesn't take another few months for the claim to be agreed.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:14 pm
by Andy101
When you say back to square one, does that mean the money I've put into the IVA comes back to me (for putting into a different IVA) or does the IP keep some or all of it?
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:17 pm
by MelanieGiles
The money will be held in trust for the IVA creditors - to be distributed on a pari-passu basis once all claims have been agreed. And the IP will deduct his fees as well from those monies.
You do raise a very interesting point here Andy, and I am going to discuss it further with colleagues tomorrow as it is something for all IPs to be very mindful of when deadlines for closure are looming. I suspect we have all been guilty of falling foul if this one occasionally.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:25 pm
by Andy101
OK, cool. I'll leave it with you. Wasn't sure what you were saying though.
If the IP had breached the agreement, would he still be able to take his fee or would the whole amount be available for transfer to a new IVA?