Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:44 pm
by Natmac1975
Hi all
Can you please advise, if I manage to secure a nominal maintenance payment from my ex for my children and this is paid into bank accounts for them (eg for activities, school trips) will this be classified as additional income to me and my I&E adjusted?
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:34 pm
by kallis3
Hi Natmac,
Not sure how this is classed - I would speak to your IP about it.
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:42 pm
by Broke of London
Hi - I imagine this would go down under your income as it will offset some of the costs for the children.
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:43 pm
by Foggy
Be best to await an experts opinion on this -- but if the accounts the money is being paid into are in the children's names it is their money. If it is going into one of your accounts it is your income. However you should be able to offset much ( if not all ) of it in your expenditure.
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:44 pm
by kallis3
Something that needs to be sorted out with the IP I think.
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 4:42 pm
by MelanieGiles
Child maintenance received from your ex-partner will be treated as income for the purpose of calculating your disposable income - but don't let this put you off collecting the money as it should be paid across to you by way of obligation.
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:03 pm
by Natmac1975
The ex wants me to agree to claiming no maintenance fo 4 years in order to cancel out his share of the equity in our home (which is annoying since he never made a mortgage contribution in the 10 years we were together which is probably why i'm on an iva and he is not!)
The kids want to do dance classes and music lessons which I cant really afford out of my current budget, so I was hoping he could foot the bill for their lessons. It will be another 8 months until annual review.
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:14 pm
by Broke of London
Can you ask their father to pay for these activities direct to the dance school etc? That way he is paying for his children to go to their classes and financially it doesn't have anything to do with you.
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:49 am
by kallis3
That's a good idea, at least the kids could do their activities and you don't have to worry about finding any money for it.
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:23 am
by Michael Peoples
I would agree that it would be best for the ex to pay for these items directly. However, it may have been a condition of the original IVA that Natmac seeks maintenance and if this is the case she would need to proceed in line with the modifications.