Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:05 am
by julie.1
does my IVA supervisor have to provide me with a breakdown of their fees and a cost information sheet with a breakdown of costs
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 8:20 am
by Broke of London
The fees will be detailed in your chairman's report from the acceptance meeting - it would have been at this point that you agreedto the fees. I'm not sure if they are required to provide you with a breakdown of costs as their business model and profit margins aren't really any business of the client.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 8:32 am
by Niobe
Ours are on our chairmans reports. We are both happy with them and obviously the creditors were as well.
I don't think they have to provide us with a breakdown.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:23 am
by Shining
I'm provided with a detailed breakdown, I would have thought but this is only my thoughts that a breakdown would be provided as it's your IVA. x
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:35 am
by Niobe
We get a breakdown of where our money has gone but not their business model and profit margin.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:39 am
by Shining
I wasn't referring to that I meant the cost of running the IVA, letter sent etc., I wouldn't have a clue without asking daughter what any of that was if I'm honest.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:49 am
by Niobe
Sorry Lesley - we get a breakdown of our payments but that's all. We are happy with that.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:55 am
by Shining
I might have read the OP wrong but I thought it meant fees incurred with the ssetting up of and the administration of the IVA. All of which I've been provided with and I don't personally need to know any more.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:09 am
by Niobe
You're very likely right and it's me that's read it wrong.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:20 am
by TheMatrix
Full details get provided at the end where they breakdown costs and dividend payments made over the years in the IVA to who and who was included. Max Recovery mainly in the end bought up most of mine with the exception of First Direct and Capital One who remained one of my creditors throughout.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:50 am
by Broke of London
I see a breakdown of fees on my annual report but I don't see a breakdown of how costs are incurred. The 15% commission isn't related to costs so in that that sense the costs are irrelevant.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:06 pm
by MelanieGiles
Each year, the Supervisor has to issue an annual report to their clients and the creditors showing the level of fees drawn. If clients want any more detailed breakdown, they are entitled to receive such information under our regulatory best practice guidelines.
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:49 am
by dawn20
what is the meaning of the nominees fee and why is it set at £2.500 on top of which you then pay £100 monthly fees to your ip just a question as ive never got a straight answer to this one can anyone enligthen me?
just to add my iva although ive completed the 60 months im still paying more fees until the cc i9s sent thats then taken my total fees to just over £9,000 to date and counting ps iva arrangement as for debt of £27,000 to start with
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:09 am
by MelanieGiles
The nominee fee is the fee charged by the IP for all work carried out prior to the creditors meeting, and the supervisor's fee covers all work carried out after the creditors meeting.
Those fees you are quoting do look on the high side, but presumably you agreed them with your IP in advance and they were ratified by creditors at the meeting. Not sure why you are still paying fees if your case is ready for closure. Are you still paying in contributions?
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:19 am
by Broke of London
The nominee fee looks very similar to mine but the supervisor fees look high. Mine are 15% of realisations and from memory I don't think there is anything else, maybe a few expenses. At the end of the day, as long as the fees being taken are in line with what was agreed by you and the creditors in the chairman's report from your acceptance meeting then the IP is doing nothing wrong. There may be something in your case that justified the higher fee.