Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Hi hoping for a bit of advise \ clarification?
I have 10 months left on my IVA, which Northern Rock (proposed by Eversheads LLP on behalf of Northern Rock) from the outset put a modification into my IVA proposal stating that the IVA be extended to 72 months from 60 months, they also stated that any equity release will now happen at month 66 (which is fast approaching) and if I am unable to obtain a remortgage the 12 month extension will happen after month 72, as we all know it is nearly impossible to obtain a remortgage whilst in an IVA so with this clause in the IVA proposal I should be resigned to a 12 month extension!!
But on the same modifications page of my IVA proposal MBNA (Eversheads proposed on behalf of MBNA) state that "The duration of the arrangement shall not exceed 72 months"!!
So I am trying to understand which one of these will stand, as one is saying that it will not exceed 72 months yet the other is saying that a 12 month extension in lieu of not being able to obtain a remortgage will happen after 72 months??
Also both modificatons from the original proposal where proposed by Evershead on behalf of Northern Rock and MBNA, I presume the same company that has contradicted itself in the same proposal!!
Help need to know if I am to put the bubbles on ice or hold!!
I have 10 months left on my IVA, which Northern Rock (proposed by Eversheads LLP on behalf of Northern Rock) from the outset put a modification into my IVA proposal stating that the IVA be extended to 72 months from 60 months, they also stated that any equity release will now happen at month 66 (which is fast approaching) and if I am unable to obtain a remortgage the 12 month extension will happen after month 72, as we all know it is nearly impossible to obtain a remortgage whilst in an IVA so with this clause in the IVA proposal I should be resigned to a 12 month extension!!
But on the same modifications page of my IVA proposal MBNA (Eversheads proposed on behalf of MBNA) state that "The duration of the arrangement shall not exceed 72 months"!!
So I am trying to understand which one of these will stand, as one is saying that it will not exceed 72 months yet the other is saying that a 12 month extension in lieu of not being able to obtain a remortgage will happen after 72 months??
Also both modificatons from the original proposal where proposed by Evershead on behalf of Northern Rock and MBNA, I presume the same company that has contradicted itself in the same proposal!!
Help need to know if I am to put the bubbles on ice or hold!!