Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 1:11 pm
by tra23dog
Hi, I completed an IVA in 2013 and since then EIC have been dealing with PPI. Today I receive a letter from GT stating that a new Law firm are now dealing with PPI claims and I have to sign letters to say I am happy for them to act. I am really fed up as I have done the same with EIC over 2 years ago. Do I have to sign these letters or can I say enough is enough!!
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 2:02 pm
by Foggy
The new firm, Slater Hayward Law did my PPI and are far more efficient than EIC --- who seem to rumble on forever. SHL did all of my PPI during the term of the IVA ( which only ran for 2 and a half years ), didn't slow down completion and I haven't heard from them since.
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 2:29 pm
by lifenoteasy
As there is a deed of assignment in place technically it is an issue between GT, EIC and SHL.
You only need to be notified that they will be progressing things in future.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 1:08 am
by thisusernameistaken
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by Foggy
The new firm, Slater Hayward Law did my PPI and are far more efficient than EIC --- who seem to rumble on forever. SHL did all of my PPI during the term of the IVA ( which only ran for 2 and a half years ), didn't slow down completion and I haven't heard from them since.
Great; CF use EIC (they're all co-directors of each others' companies).
I have no issue with PPI being checked during my IVA but if it holds up the issuing of the CC they'll have one pissed-off bloke on their hands..
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 5:00 pm
by Pandy
We have not had a letter of GT telling me about a change of PPI company so does that mean EIC are still doing ours it was nearly complete were just waiting on 1 more of mine and 1 more of hubbies.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 6:00 pm
by marksam1
So strange everyone just 1 claim to go hmmm,