Hi northumbrian
The answer is in the modification - you get the house valued in the fourth year and seek two independent offers of re-mortgage. You are obliged to take out the one which gives creditors the most money, and can then finalise the IVA as the additional mortgage payments will probably absorb your disposable income. The modification goes on to say that if you cannot re-mortgage, then the IP is to call a meeting of creditors to ascertain an appropriate way forward.
The percentage which constitutes full and final settlement, is the amount you are able to borrow from your new mortgage - and this cannot be ascertained until the property is valued and suitable mortgage offers sought. The bottom line is that you could be required to borrow enought to pay all of your debts off in full - perhaps including statutory interest as well which runs at 8% per annum.
If you were my client, and I was faced with the situation in 4 years time that you were unable to afford to borrow the equity money, then I would recommend to your creditors that they accept what they have received to date in full and final settlement. I have done this on several occasions with success.
I have to say that I am rather suprised that you are only now realising the implication of the modification you agreed on the day of the creditors meeting. This has serious implications if you have not understood the requirements, or they have not been properly explained to you. Were you perhaps carried along by the heady exilaration of IVA acceptance, without realising you were committing your home (or at least the bit that you own) to your creditors as well as making contributions? Did your IP clearly explain this to you on the day of the creditors meeting?
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.
For further details contact me at
http://www.melaniegiles.com and view my IVA blog at:
http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk