The point goes back to my original post, Minnie, that creditors will perceive that you have benefitted from the monies borrowed by your husband.
Let me try and paint a hypothetical scenario:-
Postion Now:
Hubby earns £1,500 You earn £2,250. Hubby therefore earns 40% of the combined income and you owe 60%. This percentage is then applied to the shared household expenditure. So if you have expenditure of £3,000 per month, hubby pays £1,200 and you pay the difference.
I appreciate that this may not be how you actually manage your finances, but this is how they are generally viewed in insolvency or matrimonial law.
So for the purposes of the IVA, your hubby has £300 per month surplus income, and you have £450. If you have financial commitments of your own - lets say you have credit cards which you pay at £400 per month, this has to be deducted from your share firstly, leaving a small surplus which your husband's creditors will expect you to pay to them. So his payments are set at £350 per month.
Lets say that at the end of the first year you have both had payrises. So now your hubby takes home £1,700 and you take home £2,300. The ratio percentages change to 43% and 57%. Say your household expenditure has increased to £3,200. Hubby now pays £1,376 which after deduction from his earnings of £1,700 leaves him with increased payments of £324. Your surplus income has also increased by £76.
I would expect to see you still supporting your husband to enable him to maintain his payments of £350, but not that you pay over the full £76. You would need to use £26 to continue funding him, leaving the extra £50 untouched for yourself.
Hope this is not too complicated for you to see where I am coming from.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.
For further details contact me at
http://www.melaniegiles.com and view my IVA blog at:
http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk