Best option at Variation Meeting

2 posts Page 1 of 1
 
 

MillyBo

User avatar
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by MillyBo » Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:26 pm
I have spent the last few days working out exactly how much my salary will be over the next few years if I get promotion, and it isn't so much the doom and gloom I thought! I have worked out that because my partner and I would then be at the bottom of our new grades each year we should get an annual increment (which we haven't done for 2plus years because we were at the top of the previous grade). This means the difference won't be as drastic, it would mean instead of repaying just under £49,000, we would only be able to pay between £41,000 and £44,000 - so a drop of £8,000 max - which isn't brilliant but better than my first calculations.

I will be speaking to my IP this week, and my question before I speak to him is, if successful in promotion, and therefore needing a Variation Meeting, which of the two is the best course of action that my IP may recommend to me/my creditors - a) ask Creditors to accept the loss (currently paying back 43p in the pound), though if we get further promotions this can be looked at, or b)ask us to pay for a further year (well it would work out at 7 months at the same rate) but this would incur another year's IP costs as well as the cost of the Variation meeting.

I ask this because I wasn't sure if our IP may be biased and want the extra year's IP costs!

Also, at the Annual Reviews, if your wages increase and you give your creditors more money, does it just go straight to them or does a Variation meeting have to be held to inform them all of it, and if so, does the cost go to the debtor (don't have my documentation).
Thanks
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:35 pm
Contrary to popular thought, most insolvency practitioners are not motivated by fee earning potential alone!!! Most of us take time to balance the expectations of creditors against your ability to pay, to reach a sensible compromise. My personal view is that if you could make up the difference in 7 additional payments, then you ought to - with the proviso that if you were able to increase your payments over the remaining months, and thus clear the arrers by the end of the fifth year, then no extension would be necessary - and therefore no fee!

Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.

For further details contact me at http://www.melaniegiles.com and view my IVA blog at: http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
2 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to “IVA postbag for august”