Blair Endersby wrote:
Attitude
I can not comment on the specifics of your case here as this would be inappropriate and also I do not have them. Pleasec contact me to disucss, but as stated above if your debts are higher than in the proposal we can go back to the creditors and get the level agreed. It is not unusual for creditors to make mistakes in their claims and you should go through any information sent to you to see where you dispute any claims.
You should not be paying the joint debt though the other debtor would have to come to an arrangement to pay it but this would reduce the claim of the original creditor in the VA and the other party may be able to make a cliam in your VA.
Please contact me.
Since you are now asking Attitude to see if he / she disputes the value of these claims, I assume that you would yourself have already had sight of the claims and supporting documentation.
I also assume that Attitude provided you with up to date statements of account to :-
1) Assist in the preparation of an accurate list of liabilities and statement of affairs.
But more importantly
2) Enable the Nominee to qualify the statement that Attitude's position as to assets and liabilities was not
materially different from that which it was represented to the creditors to be.
Could you therefore not determine yourself why there is what you call a '
material irregularity'? Compare the information in your possession that you initially verified the level of liabilities for statement of affairs purposes to that provided in support of claims received? Where differences have arisen, you ought to be able to identify the cause of such an increase.
Tell it like it is.