font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by MelanieGiles
OK - there was a time prior to the advent of the IVA Protocol in 2008, that we used our own bespoke terms and conditions in my practice as well. So if this is the case in your case, the R3 Terms and Conditions have no relevance I would have thought.
Hi Mel, its only after trawling through all the copies of copies of paperwork they thought necessary to send at the time that I have trimmed it down to the actual proposal, the creditor "enforced" variation document (I say enforced as it was basically a take it leave it situation whereby I accept the variations or take BR as my only option), and the T's & C's.
One of the problems I have found recently (prior to finding the original T's & C's) is that the advisor's on the phone have no knowledge of T's & C's other than the ones they direct you to on their web site and have no knowledge of the content of older IVA proposals.
I personally believe (until someone can enlighten me to the contrary) that IP's are taking a shotgun approach to their variations letter and sending them out to all those in an IVA without checking if their individual IVA is all assets or not.
As you have said many times each and every IVA is different and I don't think the IP's have the resources to review each one which adds furthermore to all the confusion..
Just to add to the PPI scenario further, if you are entitled to a PPI reclaim and your debt has been sold on by the original lender would:
the original lender take the amount off the original debt they held (even though its been sold on)
or
would they pass it on to the company who has bought the debt (most debts are bought for a percentage of their face value so theoretically the purchaser could be in profit through the PPI refund)
or
would they pass it on the the IP
Any comments welcome.....