james.c wrote:
when i applied for an iva, i went to thomas charles, were i had to pay them two months fees to show that I could manage the payments - they did say if the IVA was not succesfull the money would be returned. Then they passed me on to accuma who finished everything of. the teo payemnts mad to thomas charles did not go in to my IVA.
Questions -
1 - what happened to that money, was it just to pay thomas charles ?
2 - If I had known better should i have gone direct to accuma and not had to pay these two months?
no matter how bad money gets, theirs stll alot more important things in life
I think you need to look closely at the letter of engagement from Thomas Charles and establish exactly what those monies you paid to them were used for.
I note they are represented on this forum and hopefully will be able to pass comment on your circumstances directly. Their website does state
Our fees:
We charge 2 extra payments (so your IVA is 62 months rather than 60 months). These payments are based on your affordable income and you would need to talk to an advisor to find out more. Click here for a list of advisors.
PLEASE NOTE: These two payments are refunded if the IVA is not accepted.
On only a very brief glance of the website, I was unable to find mention of any Licensed Insolvency Practitioners. I can only assume from that that they are debt advisors and as such, without a Licensed Insolvency Practitioner, cannot put forward IVA's themselves and refer them on to, in this instance, Accuma. However, as an advisor they would be entitled to charge you for their advice.
It's always worth weighing up the pros and cons of consulting an advisor as opposed to a Licensed Insolvency Practitioner.
Tell it like it is.
Tell it like it is.