Hello Sully
I don't feel that any of your claimed expenditures are particularily unreasonable and feel we have had many similar cases go through.
Sky, can be quite contentious but we are still finding that creditors are currently allowing this expense. I also agree with you that because social expenditure is not included in an IVA it is not unreasonable to have a Sky package although you may find that the creditors query it if you have an all signing all dancing package which costs in excess of £60-70 per month.
I have never experienced a creditor querying an internet budget. This costs c£10 per month or less with some providers so can't imagine why anyone would have a problem with this expense, especially as you claim it is needed for your Partners work.
Two mobile phones at £250 does seem a lot of money although if you can prove that you need these within the course of your employment then it would be in the interests of the creditors in the long run to allow this. Perhaps I would have recommended shopping around for a cheaper provider though as £125 each per month does sound fairly high.
However, despite this, it is ultimately down to your creditors to stipulate your personal expenses and really you shouldn't have agreed to the IVA if you felt it was unaffordable. However, I am not judging you as I know how much pressure people are under at this time and often people will agree to unrealistic budgets with the best will in the world of trying to stick to them.
Outline your concerns to your IP and see if you can free up some room for these costs.
Have either of you had any pay increases which you could claim to offset by the increased mobile costs?
Best Regards
Oliver
Thomas Charles and Co Ltd.
Experts in personal debt solutions.
Read customer feedback at:
www.thomascharles.com/about_us.asp