I meant to address this point earlier when I was in the office, but better late than never.
If you look at thread
http://www.iva.co.uk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=15276 this is clearly not a black and white issue. I agree wholeheartedly that debt avoidance for the feckless and reckless is to be discouraged and that wholesale writing off of debts for no reason when they have been genuinely run up and should genuinely have been repaid in the normal manner is a recipe for disaster for more reasons than one.
However, that should not disguise the fact that the FSA has levied very large fines on a significant number of lenders for the blatant mis-selling of PPI. As the thread above illustrates, if a genuine case exists then it should be pursued with all vigour by whomsoever a victim chooses to represent them. This is only a personal opinion, but I suspect that the PPI issue will, in the end, absolutely dwarf the bank charges issue that the banks have so far fought tooth and nail against.
I am led to believe that precedent already exists on this, so the high court appeals and delaying tactics doesn't seem to be a ploy that can be used in this issue.
It will be very interesting to see where all this ends, as I am not naive enough to believe that only those with a genuine case will benefit, which is where your "ambulance chasers" in this field may come in.
Regards.