FSA FINES ADVISER £840,000 FOR PPI FAILINGS

3 posts Page 1 of 1
 
 

CoverItAll

User avatar
Posts: 339
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:19 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by CoverItAll » Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:12 am
The FSA has fined Liverpool Victoria Banking Services Limited (LVBS) £840,000 for serious failings in the sale of single premium payment protection insurance (PPI). The penalty was imposed for failings in relation to PPI offered to customers who telephoned LVBS seeking unsecured personal loans between 14 January 2005 and 8 August 2007.

The regulator said that when customers rang LVBS to apply for a personal loan, LVBS added the cost of PPI to the quotation without the customer asking for it. If customers realised they did not have to buy the cover and objected to it, LVBS then put pressure on them to take the PPI. When speaking to customers LVBS did not explain that the cost of the single premium PPI was added to the loan and that as a result customers paid additional interest on the PPI premium for the life of the loan.

LVBS was also found to have provided inadequate information to its telephone customers about the features, exclusions and limitations of PPI and often provided information that was unclear, unfair or misleading. In 97 sales calls reviewed, the FSA found over 60% to be non-compliant.

Margaret Cole, FSA director of enforcement, said: “The LVBS sales process was flawed in its design. The firm has stopped all sales of PPI and is now proposing a comprehensive programme to contact its customers and pay them compensation where appropriate. The FSA expects firms to treat customers fairly, particularly when failings have been identified. This proposal for remedial action sets an example for other firms to follow.”

As part of the redress package agreed by LVBS, the interest paid on the PPI premium will be refunded automatically. The firm will be writing to its PPI customers asking them to review the terms of their PPI policy and offering to pay full redress where appropriate. LVBS agreed to extend the scope of its redress proposals to include a review of all PPI offered via telephone, internet or post between 14 January 2005 and 31 January 2008.
John Tegg
john.tegg@dms4asu.co.uk
http://www.paymentcover.co.uk
STANDARD TERMS for Forum Members for Home Insurance, Self Employed Tradesman's Public Liability, and Short Term Income Protection.
 
 

size5

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 3104
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:22 pm

Post by size5 » Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:20 pm
Very interesting field this John, I know that there is a lot of interest in recovery of compensation for mis-sold PPI's and you can be sure that LVBS will be in no way the worst offenders here.

Regards.
Cert DR
23+ years in debt advice
I do not post for anyone other than myself

Follow my tweets at http://twitter.com/debtmastersize5
 
 

CoverItAll

User avatar
Posts: 339
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:19 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by CoverItAll » Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:58 pm
I agree size5.

If any Forum Member thinks they may have been missold PPI in the past, we will look into this for them, and help them to try to recover their premiums - ABSOLUTELY FREE OF CHARGE.

We feel about these firms rather like the IP's on here feel about the IVA Council.
John Tegg
john.tegg@dms4asu.co.uk
http://www.paymentcover.co.uk
STANDARD TERMS for Forum Members for Home Insurance, Self Employed Tradesman's Public Liability, and Short Term Income Protection.
3 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to “postings for july”