Green vs Wright Test case

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
7 posts Page 1 of 1
 
 

Meoverhere

User avatar
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:25 pm
Location:

Post by Meoverhere » Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:36 pm
Was there any news on the Green Vs Wright test case that was due to be heard on 16th Nov? (this was the test court case relating to PPI refunds after an IVA has satisfactorily completed)
 
 

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:46 am
The decision was postponed to allow further consideration.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:03 am
The decision may not be given until the New Year as there is a lot for the judges to consider. The fact that they did not reach a quick decision may mean that they feel there is merit in the appeal.
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com

sponge

User avatar
Posts: 1094
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 4:25 pm
Location:

Post by sponge » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:42 pm
am I reading this right, the Chancery Division (the high court)? dismissed the appeal?
green v wright
Insolvency – Individual voluntary arrangement. The respondent former debtor's individual voluntary arrangement had been successfully completed and the appellant former supervisor had issued a completion certificate, under para 9(2) of the R3 Standard Conditions (version 2), before further funds had been received. The county court held that the funds should be paid to the respondent and the appellant appealed. The Chancery Division, in dismissing the appeal, held that para 9(2) of the Standard Conditions operated to release a debtor from all debts subject to the arrangement and meant that the arrangement had come to an end. Accordingly, the county court had reached the correct conclusion.

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:49 pm
Yes ... the High courts dismissed the appeal and upheld the opinion of the County Court. However the appeal was taken to the Court of Appeal,which is higher, and this is the decision everyone is awaiting, so the matter is still pending appeal. Of course it could still go further, whilst we still have the European Courts to appeal to.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014

sponge

User avatar
Posts: 1094
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 4:25 pm
Location:

Post by sponge » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:57 pm
Hi foggy hope you're doing well? And that makes sense thanks

Foggy

User avatar
Posts: 33396
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:14 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Foggy » Mon Dec 05, 2016 5:08 pm
Hi Sponge. Yes all well here, thank you -I hope all is well with you also.

As you know, this case revolves around R3 terms and conditions. I would hope that, whatever the result, everyone follows the spirit of the judgement, rather than the letter, and apply it to arrangements under other Ts & Cs without the need to test it again.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014
7 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”