Hi lucasz
Sorry no-one has been around to answer your query earlier. When the forum is busy, and there are lots of postings, sometimes the earlier ones can slip off the page before an expert gets to read them.
Why would you want to prefer Northern Rock over your other unsecured creditors if you are intent on applying for bankruptcy? Whilst Northern Rock would be no doubt delighted with you, the other creditors would be unlikely to receive anything under a subsequent bankruptcy. The principle of dealing with insolvent estates is that each creditor gets a fair share of your estate - in your case this is minimal and limited to equity before costs of realisation of about £11,000.
I can see that there would be some advantages for you in your suggestion, as you say you can afford to maintain the Northern Rock lending and this would effectively leave you with negative equity in the bankruptcy, thus probably securing your home from the actions of a Trustee, but as a licenced insolvency practitioner I have some difficulty in observing a deliberate preference. I am sure that others who post on the forum will have differing views!
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.
For further details contact me at
http://www.melaniegiles.com and view my IVA blog at:
http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk