Is what IP is suggesting fair or correct?

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
3 posts Page 1 of 1
 
 

Jbucker3

User avatar
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 12:58 pm
Location:

Post by Jbucker3 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:46 pm
HI,
My Income and Expenditure is due to change due to my wife being pregnant. Over the last 3 years my income has increased and thus each review my payment has increased. However they have always worked on working out my surplus income and adding 50% of the said surplus to my repayment amount. Leaving the other 50% availble to me. My IP has reviewed our projected new I&E(without my wifes income) They are looking to reduce my current payment to a figure still larger than the original figured agreed within my agreement, however now want to take 100% of our surplus. Is what they are suggesting fair or correct? Any advice appreciated. thanks in advance.
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:57 pm
It really depends upon the wording of your specific IVA documents, but remember the key to this must always be affordability. If you feel that the IP is asking for a payment you will not be able to afford, then you must raise this with them at an early stage. No-one will want to see an IVA failing which has gone more than half its way to completion.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

liamjames

User avatar
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:58 am
Location:

Post by liamjames » Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:22 am
I agree entirely. It's not common to change the system used to calculate income reviews mid-IVA, but I'm sure that your IP has reasons for suggesting this. If the new payments are not affordable, then raise this urgently.
Take care,

Liam James
Varden Nuttall
http://www.vardennuttall.co.uk

Read our reviews here: http://www.iva.com/iva_companies/Varden_Nuttall.asp
3 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”