IVA approved! thanks to everyone who posted

169 posts Page 9 of 12
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Wed May 30, 2007 4:19 pm
Hi Sensible

In my earlier posts I have advised you of the 40p criteria required by these creditors, so I am sure that if you can hit that sort of dividend you will be eventually successful. There is no leeway on this at the moment - regardless of who is acting for you.

Good luck for 2 weeks time.

Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.

For further details contact me at http://www.melaniegiles.com and view my IVA blog at: http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Sensible77

User avatar
Posts: 625
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Sensible77 » Wed May 30, 2007 5:25 pm
Thanks for the responses. We've both had a good talk about things this afternoon. My pension payment will increase the dividend to over 40p which hopefully will secure a yes vote from TDX on behalf of HSBC, but if KPMG still vote no I still won't have a majority. The Chairman told me that the people who voted no did not say why. Is this normal or is it a case of them not saying what they will accept so that they may get an even better offer?
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Wed May 30, 2007 5:28 pm
In my experience creditors usually confirm why they are rejecting - and KPMG will definately do this if they are asked.

Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.

For further details contact me at http://www.melaniegiles.com and view my IVA blog at: http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Sensible77

User avatar
Posts: 625
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Sensible77 » Wed May 30, 2007 5:41 pm
The Chairman did say that KPMG noted that the cost of the car that I lease through work seemed quite high and that my monthly fuel expediture also seemed high. This seemed odd to me as they do not know what car I have and how many miles I travel to work. TDX refused as my proposal was less than 40p. I seem to have answered my own question!
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Wed May 30, 2007 8:52 pm
Strange that your IP did not include this detail in the proposal. It is usually sensible to try and answer the creditors likely questions within the body of the proposal, rather than go throught the tedium of adjourment proceedings, but in your case this was necessary as the dividend you were offering was known to be unacceptable to certain creditors.

Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.

For further details contact me at http://www.melaniegiles.com and view my IVA blog at: http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Sensible77

User avatar
Posts: 625
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Sensible77 » Wed May 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Hi, Melanie. Thanks for the response. To be honest, I feel like I have wasted the last 2 months. As you said before, I don’t understand why Payplan submitted my proposal with the strong likelihood that it would be rejected. All the Chairman suggested was to go into a DMP for 3 months then submit a new IVA. He didn’t mention the adjournment or any ways to improve the offer. In fact I had to ask about an adjournment. I feel that without the help of this board and the research I have done I would probably have accepted the DMP or commenced bankruptcy proceedings. It’s not yet dead in the water, but I’m not filled with much hope at the moment.
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Wed May 30, 2007 10:07 pm
Sensible

I feel sure that your creditors will change their minds - but your credibility is on the line as they may wonder if you can improve your offer now, why you didn't put that offer forward in the first place. That said - the adjournment procedure is rightfully therefore for you to take advantage of - and to have another try. I feel sure that you will succeed next time.

Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.

For further details contact me at http://www.melaniegiles.com and view my IVA blog at: http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Sensible77

User avatar
Posts: 625
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Sensible77 » Wed May 30, 2007 10:17 pm
Hi, Melanie. You're absolutely right. I wanted to include my pension contribution in my proposal but was told that it wouldn't be necessary. At the end of the day you are led by the professionals so I did not doubt their advice. This has been an eye opener for me, as I can now see why IVA's sometimes fail. The people entering into an IVA are in a vulnerable and uninformed position and expect the IP to do the best for them.
 
 

thebear29uk

User avatar
Posts: 440
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:12 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by thebear29uk » Thu May 31, 2007 1:53 am
Hi Sensible

I know a while back some of us queried you going forward with your proposal when HSBC had a definite policy of 40p in the £. This doesn't make us any happier to be proved right. However it does potentially give you serious food for thought. Following the concerns voiced here you discussed this with Payplan and placed your trust in them to put forward the proposal. You offered ways of increasing the dividend but were told it was not necessary.

This is where, as you rightly say, you are reliant on the IP knowing the voting criteria of the various creditors. If it subsequently gets rejected you cannot be held responsible.

I truly hope that your amended proposal is accepted.

Best wishes

Dave
Regards

Dave

View my blog at www.thebear29uk.blogs.iva.co.uk/
 
 

tracy.h

User avatar
Posts: 672
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:20 am
Location:

Post by tracy.h » Thu May 31, 2007 9:55 am
Hi Sensible
Im sorry you didnt get the news you were hopeing for,but all is not lost lets hope payplan can get this sorted asap,its just a shame they never put your pension contributions forward to begin with they must realise being in the industry that HSBC
 
 

tracy.h

User avatar
Posts: 672
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:20 am
Location:

Post by tracy.h » Thu May 31, 2007 10:00 am
i'll finish sorry pressed wrong button.
would not except less than 40p in the £,it just seems unfair that you now have to wait AGAIN for them to do what they should of done in the first place.
But i'm sure Melanie is correct and with a revised offer you will be successfull.
I really do hope so
 
 

Adam Davies

User avatar
Posts: 14596
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:21 pm
Location:

Post by Adam Davies » Thu May 31, 2007 12:04 pm
Hi
You must feel very frustrated knowing what you do.
I suggest a lengthy chat with your IP and push to get your proposal through.
Regards

Andy Davie
IVA.co.uk Spokesperson and site manager
(aka Neverending)

Please check out my blog: http://andydavie.blogs.iva.co.uk

View my profile here:
http://www.iva.co.uk/andy_davie_profile.asp
Andam Davies
 
 

Sensible77

User avatar
Posts: 625
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Sensible77 » Thu May 31, 2007 1:01 pm
Thanks for the responses. I've been in touch with Payplan today by e-mail. The dividend will now increase to 46p which should be OK. I have received the comments made by KPMG as to why they refused, but without wanting to go into detail at the moment, this could easily have been sorted within the proposal. Once this is sorted either way I am prepared to start a blog, but I feel these posts keep it to the forefront better. As this thread is now spread over 7 pages and is probably quite tedious to read in full, would it be a good idea to start a new thread, "IVA with Payplan 2", with a link to the original thread?
 
 

admin

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by admin » Thu May 31, 2007 1:18 pm
Hi Sensible,
Please do keep posting on this thread so that we can all follow it to its successful conclusion!

regards, admin
Admin

Posting Guidelines:
Industry Experts
-Must have appropriate licenses
-Advice is transparent and clear
-No solicitation (web link in signature is ok)

Forum Experts
-Give advice based on personal experience
-Are impartial and transparent
 
 

Sensible77

User avatar
Posts: 625
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Sensible77 » Thu May 31, 2007 4:48 pm
Will do!
169 posts Page 9 of 12
Return to “IVA approved!”