IVA costs [IP charges]

49 posts Page 1 of 4
 
 

rickyg33

User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:09 pm
Location:

Post by rickyg33 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:27 pm
I'm looking for some feedback on likely IP costs over the term of the IVA.

I understand that these can vary, but some feedback from those with experience would be helpful.

Thanks,

rickyg
 
 

Adam Davies

User avatar
Posts: 14596
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:21 pm
Location:

Post by Adam Davies » Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Hi
New protocol and current TIX proposals[they represent some of the major banks] dictate that IP fees will be linked to the monthly IVA payments.Typically 4 or 5 times the monthly payment for nominee fees and thereafter 15% of the monthly payment to be kept for fees.
Today in the vast majority of cases the IP fees have reduced compared to a few years ago.
On a £400 monthly IVA the IPs fee will be £4300[incl of vat]so they will actually net about £3600.
When you consider that the IP will do a huge amount of work before receiving any money[and no guarantee that they will get anything] and that they have to supervise your case for five years I think that it is money well earned
Regards
Andam Davies
 
 

rickyg33

User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:09 pm
Location:

Post by rickyg33 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:50 pm
thanks for the swift feedback
so, on a £400 per month IVA, the monthly payment would be about £460 as a guide

rickyg
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:05 pm
Hi Ricky

No the fees would come out of the monthly contribution

I.e on a £400 iva payment the first 4 or 5 payments would be kept to cover the costs of preparing the propsal and then £340 would go to you creditors and £60 would go towards the supervisor fees.

There are a few other costs that are recoved but again these all come from you monthly payment and not added to it.

However diffent companies vote for different fee stuctures but the fees would always come from your monthly contribution not added to it in all cases.

Who is your biggest creditor?

Carl
Last edited by carlmcmullen on Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:07 pm
Forgot to mention your creditors are fully aware of the fee's and are prepared to write of a lager portion of debt to cover them as the IP is not only acting on behalf of you but also acting on behalf of your creditors - therfore working for everyone [:)]
 
 

rickyg33

User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:09 pm
Location:

Post by rickyg33 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:35 pm
major creditor is CapitalOne credit card, then Lloyds TSB, then Mint
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:39 pm
Captial One will limit your IP's fees to £4,500 if they have an influencing vote, Lloyds will say that they must be capped at £10,000 and Mint will want the same formula already identified by Andy!
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Adam Davies

User avatar
Posts: 14596
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:21 pm
Location:

Post by Adam Davies » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:39 pm
Hi
Capital one tend to keep IP fees low
Regards
Andam Davies
 
 

Adam Davies

User avatar
Posts: 14596
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:21 pm
Location:

Post by Adam Davies » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:40 pm
Mel
We posted within ten seconds of each other !!
Similar answer though
Andam Davies
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:41 pm
If capital one is your major creditor and represent more than 25% then it is likely that total fee's will be restricted to £4,500 excl VAT.

However the costs of the IVA shouldnt really be an issue when considering if an IVA is the most sensible solution as like i said previously the costs are all factored into your monthly payment and not added to it and ultimately creditors will write of more debt to compenstate.

If any IP asks for upfront costs (and some do) then you need to go elsewhere as alot of providers will not charge any upfront fee's and will only begin to charge once the your VA has been approved.

Hope this helps

Carl
 
 

rickyg33

User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:09 pm
Location:

Post by rickyg33 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:43 pm
and all that 'capping' means what exactly?

CapitalOne want a bigger slice of the cake, so to speak?

the total debt looks to be about £80,000

rickyg
 
 

rickyg33

User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:09 pm
Location:

Post by rickyg33 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:47 pm
sorry, forgot to add.........

£400 on £80,000 would be about 30p in the £

with some equity added in on year 4, say £8,000, that would take it up toward 40p in the £

does this seem a realistic prospect?

of course, this is subject to proper IVA I&E procedure
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:47 pm
No it means all creditors get a bigger slice of the cake and the IP gets less for the work they do on the case.
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:49 pm
Are HSBC on your list ?
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:52 pm
Capping means that the fees are limited to, and your suggested proposal looks very realistic to me, although I don't think you have taken account of any costs in calculating the 30p in the £. So with the equity figure you suggest, a dividend of between 30p and 40p ought to be acceptable to the majority of your creditors.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
49 posts Page 1 of 4
Return to “postings for february”