IVA costs [IP charges]

49 posts Page 2 of 4
 
 

rickyg33

User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:09 pm
Location:

Post by rickyg33 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:16 pm
yes........HSBC are also on the list, but not as big a creditor [smallest in fact]
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:25 pm
Problem you have is HSBC use a company called to The Insolvency Exchange (TIX for short) to vote on there proposals.

TIX also vote on RBS (Including Mint), halifax, natwest and various others. So if TIX are voting on your proposal on behalf of HSBC then they will enforce the 40p in the rule for the rest of the creditors regardless.

So you need to be reaching that hurlde rate, and like Melanie said with costs of the IVA then you would be looking at a dividend of 30-40p in the £.

Providing you can reach this bench mark your proposal should have a good chance of approval.
 
 

rickyg33

User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:09 pm
Location:

Post by rickyg33 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:32 pm
I thought there needed to be a 75% agreement around the creditors?

How can they 'impose' a target on other creditors at voting?
 
 

rickyg33

User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:09 pm
Location:

Post by rickyg33 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:35 pm
The list in it's entirety would be:

CapitalOne
Mint
HSBC
LloydsTSB
Tesco
Marbles
Egg
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:41 pm
I will let an Expert answer the question about imposeing hurdle rates for other creditors as i dont agree or understand this ruling. TIX should vote independently for each creditor they represent but they dont !!!

There does need to be 75% acceptance from creditors but for example should lloyds have 50% of the vote and accept with no modifciations and TIX vote to impose 40p in the £ and have 25% of the vote.

You have to accept TIX modifications as if you reject them your IVA would not be approved and threfore if you accept the mods the 40p.

Hope this makes sense as it i know it is difficult to get your head around.
Last edited by carlmcmullen on Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:43 pm
Mint, HSBC, Tesco are all TIX creditors so 40p in the £ would be required.
rickyg33 wrote:

The list in it's entirety would be:

CapitalOne
Mint
HSBC
LloydsTSB
Tesco
Marbles
Egg
 
 

rickyg33

User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:09 pm
Location:

Post by rickyg33 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:48 pm
sorry but it doesn't make sense to me

I'm assuming each creditor has an even 'share' of the vote [or does the sum owed determine share?]

if there's 4 creditors and 3 vote to accept, the other 1 has no choice but to be bound by the acceptance

in my case, if there's 7 creditors, then it needs 6 out of the 7 to accept, as 5 out of the 7 is only 71%

my stumbling block as far as the 40% hurdle is concerned, if TIX represent HSBC and Mint, then that's 2 out of 7 that can reject and the other 5 have to follow suit
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:53 pm
No it is 75% in value from the creditors who vote at the meeting.

I would suggest contacting an IP and having a chat who can fully assess your situation and see if there is a way of getting past that 40p in the £. I have known to extend IVA's a little longer than 5 years to achive it.
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:00 pm
The 40% hurdle rate is only used for HSBC and not the other creditors represented by TIX. I think that they initially voted similarly for all of their clients, but latterly they seem to have been voting independently for the banks that they represent.

Have you experienced otherwise in your firm Carl, and how many IVAs are you proposing each month?
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:05 pm
I was still aware that was there policy and to the best of my knowledge they were still enforcing the 40p in £ hurdle if they represtned HSBC on all other creidtors they were representing.

You have got me thinking now and I have just sent myself an email to check this out tomorrow.

Thanks Melanie
Last edited by carlmcmullen on Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
 

emma_t

User avatar
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 3:32 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by emma_t » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:27 am
Hi ricky

I must admit when I was looking at proposing an iva I did not even consider the fees of the IP, it was much more important to me to have an IP who I had full confidence in as 5 years is a long time and it needs to be right from the start.
I knew the fees would not be in addition to my payments, and also knew that creditors would vote to bring them down if they were to high at the creditors meeting.

i would take some individual advice regarding your case and you will be guided through the level of payments you would need to make in relation to creditors hurdle rates.

have a look at www.iva.com for reviews of iva providers and goo luck
Emma x
Be positive & look after yourself, there are more important things in life than debts....

Best Wishes

Emma x
 
 

louisa.s

User avatar
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 2:10 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by louisa.s » Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:58 am
To be honest I thought very much along the lines of Emma! My IP costs were the last thing on my mind as we focused on getting our IVA accepted and starting our pathway out of debt.

Saying when i have looked at our proposal recently we seem to have a good deal. We are paying approx £7000 over the 5 years for them to do all the work which I think is very fair.
 
 

aguise

User avatar
Posts: 3907
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:24 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by aguise » Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:06 am
Hi Ricky
I notice you said you assume each creditor has an even share of the vote, they do not their percentage of vote is the percentage of debt owed. So if you owe 20,000 and one is owed 10,000 they will have 50% of the vote the others will have the other 50% again depending on how much they are owed.
As for the IP fees again it was one of the furthest things on my mind at the time, just getting help was important. Ours are about £9000 and that is for us both as we have interlocking iva's.

Ang
Last edited by aguise on Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Please visit my blog at http://aguise.blogs.iva.co.uk/
 
 

carlmcmullen

User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:55 pm
Location:

Post by carlmcmullen » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:24 pm
Hi Ricky.

I have just had a telephone conversation with The Insolvency Exchange who have confirmed that if HSBC are voting then they would enforce the 40p in the £ on all creditors they represent.

However if they have less than 25% vote the proposed dividend will apply.

Carl
Last edited by carlmcmullen on Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
 

cr15py

User avatar
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:43 am
Location:

Post by cr15py » Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:55 pm
This is something I was wondering. Halifax and HSBC were two of my creditors, and both voted through TIX. Therefore, what was separately 61% and 11% of my creditors suddenly became 72%.

Basically, what I am trying to say is that if HSBC and Halifax had voted separately, and HSBC had insisted on the increase as a modification, and Halifax had not requested any increase in my monthly contribution, then my IVA would have been accepted as it was.

TIX seems to me to be a bad thing for people applying for IVAs, because they seem to get more clout in making decisions, and therefore are on more occassions than not going to have the major percentage of debt, and therefore the deciding vote, even though it may be made up of 4 or 5 creditors.

With regards to the fees, they weren't a consideration of mine either. As Emma and Louisa say, they come out of your monthly contribution, so does it really matter whether they get 10% of it or 30% of it? It didn't to me, although I would like to think my IP gets paid well for all the questions I keep asking her!!
Last edited by cr15py on Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Chris
Visit my blog at http://cr15py.blogs.iva.co.uk
16 down, 44 to go!!
49 posts Page 2 of 4
Return to “postings for february”