Absolutely Andy - and one of the problems we are dealing with is unrealistic modifications, that clearly have not been properly thought through by the people proposing them.
I hate to say it, but I think that current standards are going to lead to a worsening of standards in our profession rather than improving them. If IPs are always going to face ridiculous requests for increases in expenditure, where guidelines prepared over two years ago by the CCCS are being quoted which are out of date and not even used by the Government's own Insolvency Service, the IVA process may be abused in order to counter this.
I have already heard instances of pet expenditure being put down, where there are no pets, and non-smokers mysteriously taking up the habit! Can I hasten to add that this will never happen in my own practice!!!
More work - often unecessary - against an arena of reduced fees. You can probably understand the amount of apathy that currently exists amongst professionals at the moment, but we will soldier on and hopefully restore lenders confidence in the IVA as a very viable repayment option in due course.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.
To have me propose an IVA for you, please visit:
http://www.melaniegiles.com/ivaEnquiry.asp
See customer feedback at:
http://www.iva.com/iva_companies/IVA_Advice_Bureau.asp