Just notified of transfer from Beeley to Creditfix. Should we sign agreement to increase fees ?

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
31 posts Page 1 of 3
 
 

Princess prozac

User avatar
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:49 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Princess prozac » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:19 pm
Hi, we have just received a letter from a company called Creditfix, informing us that they have acquired our IVA from Beeley and Co.
They want us to sign a letter to say we agree to them contacting our creditors about increasing the fees to 23%.
Should we just sign or should we be questioning this with Creditfix?
 
 

Michael Peoples

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 15189
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:36 pm
Location:

Post by Michael Peoples » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:24 pm
There are a lot of threads on this forum about CF so perhaps read through some of them before making any decision. It probably depends on your individual circumstances as to whether this would be of benefit to you, cause no affect at all or if it could be problematical.
Michael Peoples | McCambridge Duffy Insolvency Practitioners
http://www.mccambridgeduffy.com
If you would like to talk to me about proposing an IVA or have any questions at all please visit www.mccambridgeduffy.com
 
 

bereaved

User avatar
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:22 am
Location:

Post by bereaved » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:48 pm
We transferred from a different company to CF, as Michael said, loads on here about CF. Mostly those of us that got the letter saying about changes to contract, decided that it wsn't in our best interests, it went against our original contact and so we never signed. Our current contract is sufficient.

Do a search on here for more info.
 
 

Princess prozac

User avatar
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:49 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Princess prozac » Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:14 pm
The letter states that if we don't sign and return the letter within 15 days, they will take this as consent to the variation in the creditor fee adjustment.
I feel this is not going to be very straightforward.
 
 

hubert

User avatar
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:53 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by hubert » Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:20 pm
I think they've learned their lessons from ex PJG clients.

I really don't see how failure to respond can be deemed acceptance. I would love to see an expert opinion on this.

If it stands then you could just as easily write some changes of your own and do the same to them warning that no response within 15 days will be taken as acceptance.
One pay-cheque away from oblivion!
 
 

grimswold

User avatar
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 10:03 am
Location:

Post by grimswold » Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:20 pm
That's terrible. They cannot do that without your consent. Everything you do with Creditfix you need to get it in writing. If you don't want to agree to any changes then send them an email (with a delivery receipt request attached if you can) and tell them so in writing. That way you have proof and can complain if they vary your T&Cs
 
 

Lou74

User avatar
Posts: 274
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:39 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Lou74 » Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:28 pm
This is very worrying. Why are they taking on yet more cases when they can't deal with the customers they've already got??
 
 

lifenoteasy

User avatar
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:26 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by lifenoteasy » Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:30 pm
Unfortunately they can which is the lesson that they have learnt.

However, their consent processes are lousy the more that you can challenge them e.g. re PPI that would be undertaken by EIC which is also one of their trading names.

Make sure that you state how you expect them to use your information and who it can/cannot be transferred to without your consent.
IVA started March 2011, Completed March 2016 and certificate issued 11 days after final payment. It was not always easy but then some of the best decisions aren't.
 
 

hubert

User avatar
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:53 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by hubert » Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:30 pm
Act promptly and be explicit if you don't wish to sign.

Susan Wriglesworth has been subject to disciplinary action before for pushing variations through without debtor consent so we need to watch out for this - and it seems like it might be happening again.
One pay-cheque away from oblivion!
 
 

abbiesmum2003

User avatar
Posts: 955
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:50 pm
Location:

Post by abbiesmum2003 » Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Not responding classed as consent?? What?? thats not right? Why bother sending info then if can fo it snyway! might as well just put copy in our file and say oh yeah we changed them. They surely need our signature for a legally binding change to contract dont they?
 
 

lifenoteasy

User avatar
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:26 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by lifenoteasy » Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:43 pm
Its called implied consent.
IVA started March 2011, Completed March 2016 and certificate issued 11 days after final payment. It was not always easy but then some of the best decisions aren't.
 
 

BusyBea 3

User avatar
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:41 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by BusyBea 3 » Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:52 pm
Hi all, this is the first time for me being brave and posting (not hiding) so really hope no-one minds me adding to this topic, we are in the same boat as the poster of this topic we have been transferred from Beesley and Co to creditfix and unsure what to do as we only have 15mths left (extension due to equity and not being able to remortgage begins in May) which we have in writing. I will add that it is not stated anywhere that there are any other terms of variation like I know some of you guy's from PJG have had, just the hike in fees, I am really not number savvy so really worried over what this means.We may be in a position soon to offer a full and final (from my parent's wanting to help) I'm so confused if this will effect anything or not? Thanks for listening.
BusyBea 3
KB
 
 

grimswold

User avatar
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 10:03 am
Location:

Post by grimswold » Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:52 pm
But it isn't specifically and freely given, nor is it correctly informed.
 
 

lifenoteasy

User avatar
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:26 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by lifenoteasy » Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:01 pm
I didn't say it was correctly informed consent - just that it was implied.

Once you start looking at Creditfix, their website, the lack of information they provide and/or the way it is slanted the only people that the changes are intended to benefit are them.
IVA started March 2011, Completed March 2016 and certificate issued 11 days after final payment. It was not always easy but then some of the best decisions aren't.
 
 

hubert

User avatar
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:53 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by hubert » Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:02 pm
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by lifenoteasy

Its called implied consent.
I can't see that standing up in court. How can they prove you received them?

You could just as easily do the same to them and get your own terms agreed.

Doesn't make sense to me. I'd like to see a solicitors opinion on this.
One pay-cheque away from oblivion!
31 posts Page 1 of 3
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”