Lily
They are both one and the same.
If the property doesn't sell within the 12 months, then the IVA can be extended. If I were to be your Supervisor, I would have provision for this written into the IVA proposal upfront.
Your creditors may not be as hard as you think. At the moment the collections departments are hounding you - unfortunately they are just doing their jobs (and I don't agree with the methods being used.) Once an IVA is proposed, you are then dealing with a different class of person - a commercial reviewer who is taking a decision as to whether accept something in return for the debt or nothing. And assuming the case is then accepted, you are only dealing with one person - the Supervisor of the IVA.
One of the real advantages I percieve of the IVA, is that all creditors have to make a decision on a day set in time. They have to say yes or no, and after that date you know exactly where you are. If the answer is no, well at least you have tried, and it won't have cost you anthing as hopefully you will choose a "no win, no fee" insolvency practitioner.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.
View my IVA blog at:
http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk