MBNA debt sold to Max Recovery/Eversheds

17 posts Page 1 of 2
 
 

cr15py

User avatar
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:43 am
Location:

Post by cr15py » Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:04 am
Got a letter on Saturday from Eversheds saying that my MBNA account had been "transferred and assigned" to MAX Recovery Limited on 18/02/08, and administered on behalf of Eversheds LLP Solicitors.

They also said that "for the avoidance of doubt" they will be dealing direct with my nominee/supervisor.

Bearing in mind my IVA was approved 11/01/08, have I anything to worry about here?
Chris
Visit my blog at http://cr15py.blogs.iva.co.uk
16 down, 44 to go!!
 
 

markss

User avatar
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:14 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by markss » Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:06 am
hi im no expert but i think they have to abide by the IVA agreement but the experts will be along shortly try not worry im sure your safe
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:11 am
Nothing to worry about - just a simple sale and purchase of a debt. The letter has been sent for your information only.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

Oliver

User avatar
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:15 pm
Location:

Post by Oliver » Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:26 am
Your Nominee / Supervisor will be able to deal with this directly so there is no need to worry.
Best Regards
Oliver
 
 

OPTIMIST12

User avatar
Posts: 683
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by OPTIMIST12 » Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:38 am
Hi cr15py -

I have had 8 "Eversheds" / "Max Recovery" letters over the past year. Beyond these letters I have never received anything further - no letters / phone calls etc. about any of the debts in question.
47 months completed - 13 months to go.
 
 

cr15py

User avatar
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:43 am
Location:

Post by cr15py » Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:40 am
Thanks guys - just wanted to double check. The letter does say that it isn't a payment demand, and that it will be "extremely unlikely" if I hear from them again.

I shall just do the usual with it then and forward it to my IP. [:)]
Chris
Visit my blog at http://cr15py.blogs.iva.co.uk
16 down, 44 to go!!
 
 

marsha1

User avatar
Posts: 293
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:05 pm
Location:

Post by marsha1 » Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:56 pm
I got two letters from Eversheds when I was going into my IVA (October 2007)and never heard a word since. I think they are just for information.
 
 

cr15py

User avatar
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:43 am
Location:

Post by cr15py » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:16 am
I was thinking about this the other day - not worrying, just analysing/thinking/wondering!

Why would someone want to buy a debt that's covered by an IVA? I tried to think of some economic and viable reason, but I couldn't!!
Chris
Visit my blog at http://cr15py.blogs.iva.co.uk
16 down, 44 to go!!
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:18 am
Because they buy it for between 5p and 10p in the £ and then eventually (hopefully) collect a much higher dividend thereby making a profit.
Last edited by MelanieGiles on Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

buttercup

User avatar
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:08 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by buttercup » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:34 am
Why are MBNA so funny about IVAs as most of the time they would get far more from an IVA than if they sold it to Eversheds. It seems mad
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:40 am
They prefer their customers to deal with them directly rather than involving third parties.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

buttercup

User avatar
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:08 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by buttercup » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:46 am
That what is good about an IVA all creditors have the same pro rata. So it is a lot fairer really
 
 

cr15py

User avatar
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:43 am
Location:

Post by cr15py » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:52 am
Must not be getting this - why would MBNA sell my debt of £4,500 probably for about £800 when they would get a dividend back of £3,500+? I can now see why Eversheds would buy it!

Is there a lot of work done by my creditors with regards to an IVA once it has been approved?

I'm just trying to understand all angles, because apart from being in an IVA I do find the whole process very interesting!
Chris
Visit my blog at http://cr15py.blogs.iva.co.uk
16 down, 44 to go!!
 
 

buttercup

User avatar
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:08 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by buttercup » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:57 am
Seems mad I know but I expect it is a bird in the hand all be it a lot less is worth more than a bird in the bush. They may have to wait 5 years to get back a bit more but they are taking a gamble on the fact the debter will not default & go bankrupt & they may end up with nothing.
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:18 am
They would prefer to have something now and move on, rather than the administrative burden of collecting small amounts over a five year period.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
17 posts Page 1 of 2
Return to “postings for march”