I have seen the standard letter / e-mail that MBNA are sending out to clients who say that they are proposing an IVA. I think that it is very much aimed towards MBNA getting their money back rather than offering rounded advice about the options that people have for dealing with debt.
I am not convinced that all benefits of a Debt Management Plan that are listed are strictly beneficial over and above other solutions. For example to be able to potentially clear all debts within 5-10 years is clearly a benefit by itself. However, it is not so beneficial compared to Bankruptcy or a successful IVA. eg if you have no property, and decide to declare bankruptcy, than all your debts will be cleared within 12 months. If you agree and complete an IVA, your debts would be cleared in 5 years.
It is suggested that a downside to proposing an IVA is that the cost will be up to £7000. This is of course true, but we have to remember that this cost is born by all the creditors themselves and not the individual debtor. As such, the debtor is not out of pocket.
The note I have seen also suggests that if one proposes an IVA and this is rejected, then you could face potential enforced bankrutpcy. I do not believe that this is correct. If you propose an IVA and it is rejected, then you are just back to square one. You still owe what you owe (possible slightly more with additional interest and charges that have been incurred). You then need to decide whether you are best off going for a Debt Management Plan or Bankrutpcy. However, no-one is going to force you to do either of those things if you do not wish.
James Falla
Expert in IVA, Bankruptcy and informal Debt Management solutions for over 10 years.
For more information visit
www.jamesfalla.com and visit my blog at:
http://jamesfalla.blogs.iva.co.uk