Hi cliff
As your brother's major creditor is HMRC, they have a standard modification requiring a property to be sold within 6 months or then put to public auction. I assume this is why the IP has included such provision into the IVA proposal.
I question whether he really needs an IVA at all, as you are saying that he has an asset of £60,000, but debts of only £50,000. In this case he is not insolvent and therefore should not be proposing an IVA in the first place. The voting team at HMRC are very professional and experienced, and will probably throw this out if it is presented on this basis.
It is possible that your sister-in-law may have a claim against the equity under what is known as the "equity of exonoration", however she will need to prove that she has contributed financially towards the house costs during the time that she and your brother have been living as man and wife. Why was she not on the deeds in the first place?
Your option of £30,000 now and £20,000 in year 5 is not workable and will not be acceptable to HMRC. I suggest that your brother rethinks his offer, and gets a second opinion from an IP who is experienced in dealing with self-employed people. I cannot be convinced that an IVA is right here.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.
View my IVA blog at:
http://melaniegiles.blogs.iva.co.uk