Hi Catallus
I share your concerns about this - and this was raised with TIX during our meeting. It is clear that they are basing their views on mixed practices who take both low and high contributions work.
I am continuing to take on work with contributions as low as £250, and in principle have no problem with percentage basis of realisations - after all we have been doing this for years on the OR's scale - but I take exception to the nominee's fee being based upon the debtor's ability to pay. I feel that this point was taken on board, but at the moment I feel that the GT modifications regarding fees are a lot fairer - ie fixed fee for nominee work with percentage based realisations on the whole contributions or not 55 or 56 months worth.
Clearly we need that BBA and Insolvency Service protocol as soon as possible - but I do wonder if they will leave the fee structures to creditors rather that cause more controversy. And whilst other creditors are continuing to exercise fee capping, it is no wonder that we are all a bit confused.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner for over 20 years.
To have me propose an IVA for you, please visit:
http://www.melaniegiles.com/ivaEnquiry.asp
See customer feedback at:
http://www.iva.com/iva_companies/IVA_Advice_Bureau.asp