northern rock nationalised

9 posts Page 1 of 1
 
 

anais743

User avatar
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:05 am
Location:

Post by anais743 » Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:58 pm
so what does this mean to people like with the dreaded nr debt element?

whats the experts opinion.Is this good or bad news?
'There are no secrets to success. It is the result of preparation, hard work, and learning from failure
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:06 pm
It has no real effect on customers of borrowers, and depositors monies are guaranteed by HMG. The bank will continue to operate under its usual management and policies, for the forseeable future, and there is no sign so far that there will be any change in policy in personal insolvency situations.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

jpj

User avatar
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:57 am
Location:

Post by jpj » Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:30 pm
And how convenient to announce it on a sunday afternoon when most of the nation was having their afternoon nap..... A good day to bury bad news me thinks!!!
 
 

chris.g

User avatar
Posts: 2102
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by chris.g » Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:58 pm
Oh, the powers that be have been busy, deciding when to release the news with a minimum of attention......Couldn't expect anything else really......
It's nice to be back......
 
 

jpj

User avatar
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:57 am
Location:

Post by jpj » Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:04 pm
Whats £100billion amongst a few taxpayers!!!!
 
 

Lord Soth

User avatar
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Lord Soth » Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:06 pm
So when did we become enamoured of the big banks then? I understand it's bad news if one has shares in NR, but it must be a better deal for taxpayers than receiving a nominal amount from other institutions. The decision was always going to be announced when the London FTSE was closed for trading purposes. It would be very difficult, if not impossible, to bury news of this magnitude. And if it's such a bad move, why has the market reacted with a 159 point increase today?
 
 

chris.g

User avatar
Posts: 2102
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by chris.g » Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:23 pm
Government should never have intervened and wasted £55+billion of tax payers cash. That's equivalent to £3000 per tax payer,according to reports. Will the amount ever be paid off? I wonder if they would have give help to a smaller company up the financial creek?? I think not...... Could you imagine if they had ended up on the Insolvency Register.....
It's nice to be back......
 
 

jbutler

User avatar
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location:

Post by jbutler » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:17 pm
It does not seem fair that we the tax payer has to get them out of debt but they will not help there customers get out of debt
 
 

james.c

User avatar
Posts: 733
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:15 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by james.c » Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:43 pm
Gordon Brown said today that as soon as three years time, Northern Rock could make a profit for the taxpayer - This is Gordon Browns selling point to the public.

So if Northern Rock makes the tax payer a profit in three years time, say theoratical equivilent of £1000 each, does that mean Gordon will give each us £1k - the answer is NO, so that must mean he will reduce tax an wages for 12 months to get the 1k back - answer is NO, so Gordons selling point is no good to any one.

But thank you for the some of the £700 a month a pay in tax, plus council tax, plus car tax, plus tax on bills, plus tax on everything i buy and giving me nothing in return, just to help northern rock and i the tax payer gets nothing in return.
9 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to “postings for february”