OVERTIME AND BONUSES

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
23 posts Page 1 of 2
 
 

David Mond

User avatar
Posts: 4896
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:31 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by David Mond » Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:44 am
Can someone here advise as to where the current practice of paying over 45% of net receipt of this income into a IVA came from.

The 45% is basically that the debtor keeps the first 10% for himself and pays over 50% of the 90% balance.

It is certainly not in the IVA Protocol.
Regards, David Mond, Insolvency Practitioner for over 46 years. Personal Insolvency Practitioner of the year 2012, Personal Insolvency Practitioner of the year finalist 2013 & 2014 awarded by Insolvency & Rescue Magazine and 2015 finalist for Personal Insolvency Firm of the Year.
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:50 am
Wasn't there some confusion a while ago where people thought that the 10% was based on the uplift and not the basic salary? Perhaps this was not explained terribly well by their own IPs.

Just to clarify that under the IVA protocol you are allowed to retain up to 10% of your basic salary - so if you earn £1,500 per month you can keep back £150 each month from additional earnings before having to divide the balance on a 50/50 basis with the IVA supervisor.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

rosalyn

User avatar
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:32 am
Location:

Post by rosalyn » Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:43 pm
Thanks for that post melanie, that has made my situation a little clearer and feeling better. :)
 
 

David Mond

User avatar
Posts: 4896
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:31 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by David Mond » Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:34 pm
Melanie - the Protocol is silent on Overtime and Bonuses - we looked at it yesterday at the Technical Sub Committee Meeting where are you getting the information from?
Regards, David Mond, Insolvency Practitioner for over 46 years. Personal Insolvency Practitioner of the year 2012, Personal Insolvency Practitioner of the year finalist 2013 & 2014 awarded by Insolvency & Rescue Magazine and 2015 finalist for Personal Insolvency Firm of the Year.
 
 

Fox84

User avatar
Posts: 218
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:09 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Fox84 » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:02 pm
I have no information whatever in my proposal or chairman's report regarding this 10% rule, in fact I am not sure there is any definitive instruction regarding extra money earned! at the moment I am paying 50% of any extra money into my IVA which I think is reasonable.

Would be nice if there was a set of rules that were uniform but I fear this would have an adverse affect on many people's IVA's?
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:31 pm
David

On 18 July 2007 TiX issued a directive (albeit prior to the introduction) of the IVA protocol, as to the requirements of "TIX Compliant IVA". The treatment of overtime and bonuses in line with my comments above was largely accepted by the profession, on the basis that it was relatively generous to the debtor and that if it was left out of the proposal they would modify it in anyway and they probably have influence on over 80% of proposals issued.

The majority of IPs have adopted this as part of IVA protocol for this reason - and perhaps the Standing Committee ought to firm up any ambiguity on this point when you next all meet.

If the IVA protocol is silent on overtime and bonuses, why is this - and what does it think that IPs and creditors are actually doing out in the field?
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

ytsejam

User avatar
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:35 pm
Location:

Post by ytsejam » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:36 pm
As I have outlined elsewhere, my IVA was silent, and in the court papers a 50% clause was inserted.

The 45% is not strictly true either, as the %age will go up and down dependant on your starting wage and the amount your earn in addition. I'd like that 10%, but never mind!
 
 

David Mond

User avatar
Posts: 4896
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:31 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by David Mond » Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:28 pm
Thanks Melanie - it will be a point to put to the Standing Committee in due course. Thank you.
Regards, David Mond, Insolvency Practitioner for over 46 years. Personal Insolvency Practitioner of the year 2012, Personal Insolvency Practitioner of the year finalist 2013 & 2014 awarded by Insolvency & Rescue Magazine and 2015 finalist for Personal Insolvency Firm of the Year.
 
 

kallis3

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 77176
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by kallis3 » Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:55 pm
Mine is 10% over and above my normal wages and then 50% of the rest.
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt
The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.
Bob Marley.
http://kallis3.blogs.iva.co.uk
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:58 pm
That is the clause we are talking about Jan - and evidence that Payplan have also adopted this "protocol".
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

ytsejam

User avatar
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:35 pm
Location:

Post by ytsejam » Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:19 pm
Mel - my IVA is also with payplan. They have not therefore adopted this 'protocol'
 
 

kallis3

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 77176
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by kallis3 » Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:44 pm
Our IVA's, both are protocol compliant.
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt
The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.
Bob Marley.
http://kallis3.blogs.iva.co.uk
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:29 pm
The IVA protocol was only introduced in February 2008. Was your IVA commenced earlier than this ytsejam?
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

kallis3

User avatar
Forum Expert
Posts: 77176
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by kallis3 » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:07 pm
According to a post at the end of January, yjetsam's IVA was approved shortly before that, so it is after the protocol was introduced.
Sharing from experiences of dealing with debt
The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.
Bob Marley.
http://kallis3.blogs.iva.co.uk
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:49 pm
Strange that yours is based on protocol and his/hers is not - from the same firm. Unless there were specific reasons of course, as not all people have protocol related suitability.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
23 posts Page 1 of 2
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”