I have heard numerous accounts, Jan, of where Payplan have commenced an IVA allowing the debtor to keep pay rises, in total, until the review and increased payment afterward ( as per my proposal, and, presumably the Protocol). So the next year the debtor assumes the same will happen and spends the extra, only to be told that Payplan now back date the increased payments to the date of the payrise! So burdening someone already parting with all of their disposable income with arrears they weren't expecting.
Either Payplan weren't operating the terms of the IVA initially, if it had been written so as to require immediate payment of a rise, or they changed the terms incorrectly, mid-term. Either scenario is not good. And, if the former was the case and was a genuine, if lax, mistake, they should 'fess up, apologise and WARN the debtor of the change in advance of dropping arrears on them (and, I am told, threatening failure in one case if the arrears weren't made up within that "IVA year".
I must emphasise that I have no proof of any of the above and am merely repeating what I have been told, but this seems not to be an isolated tale.
My opinions are merely that .. opinions based on experience. Always seek professional advice.
IVA Completed 23rd July 2013 .... C.C. 10th January 2014