I was hoping to come back here with good news about the order having being finally set aside, but after a brief flurry of activity, apparently leading up to a review of the case by the court, I've heard nothing for a month and I'm back to getting no response from emails to CS

Karol - I didn't get a reply directly from you, I assumed the one from Danielle was related to my email. It seemed positive at first but a week has gone by now with no update so what do I do now?

Karol - thanks for the offer, I've just sent an email as requested above.

lesley_ - thanks for the IP search link, I think it gives a few more details than I already found on GT's own site, but let's hope it isn't necessary to use them.

That doesn't sound promising... nor does the second line of your signature!

I'm running the "customer services" gauntlet, I hadn't even considered that I could contact my IP directly.

I'm not happy that they're trying to abdicate any responsibility for this, I can only assume that their CS are told to do this, surely they wouldn't just make it up if they didn't know.

They just replied today saying they have done as much as they can do in writing to the creditor's solicitor and the court! They claim that removal of the restriction is entirely down to the creditor/their solicitor, and fob me off again suggesting I have to contact them. They clearly don't accept wh...

Administrator is Grant Thornton. Their latest advice: write to the creditor's solicitor and make a formal complaint

They've been fine so far but don't seem to know what to do about this problem, or perhaps they do and are avoiding it... No, I'll keep the paranoia in check for a while longer

An interim charging order was made final after my creditors meeting, over two years ago now. My understanding is that this can be set aside since both the solicitor applying and the court were contacted before the order and several times since, but to date nothing has happened. The creditor's solici...