The iPod generation left to face future of debt

3 posts Page 1 of 1
 
 

IVA News

User avatar
Posts: 507
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:08 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by IVA News » Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:58 am
The iPod generation 'left to face future of debt'

Tony Blair's policies have left a generation of young people facing an effective tax burden of almost 50 per cent, including repaying student loans and providing for pensions, an audit of his decade in power claims today.

The so-called iPod generation will be worse off than their parents, who have benefited from rising property prices and spending on health and pensions.

The report by Reform, the think-tank, said that the key policies of the Blair decade, such as high spending, increased taxes and a greater role for central government, had blocked public service reform and created new pressures on vulnerable groups such as the young.

In 2008-09 the tax burden will reach 38.1 per cent of gross income - its highest level for 25 years, Reform claims. This is one of a worrying "cocktail of factors" damaging the economic position of the young, it said.

"Policies such as the introduction of tuition fees and near-compulsory private pensions indicate that today's 18- to 34-year-olds face a tremendous burden as the 'crossover generation' who will not only fund their own provision but also fund their parents' existing entitlements," said the report.

Older generations enjoy strong housing equity, advantageous tax allowances and rising benefits at present.

"Younger people currently pay over 40 per cent of income tax - the same level as their parents - but also increasingly find their own provision for higher education and pensions."

Young people, the key engine of economic growth, are under particular pressure.

Reform calculated that in 2012 the average graduate will face an effective tax burden of 47.2 per cent including student loans and pensions contributions.

While earnings had increased by 28 per cent since 1999, the price of the average first-time property has nearly doubled.

As a result, first time property prices are now more than eight times higher than the median earnings of 22- to 29-year-olds - they were only five times higher in 1999.

A survey by Nationwide, the mortgage lender, showed that only 20 per cent of first-time buyers were aged 20 to 24, down from 30 per cent 10 years ago. Only 20 per cent of 20- to 24-year-olds are homeowners, down from 34 per cent 10 years ago.

"It is very striking that the Prime Minister said in a recent interview that the key economic challenge had changed from recession to trying to help young couples get their feet on the housing ladder.

"With tuition fees and private pension payments, the Government has begun what may well be the transfer of welfare state payments from the public sector to the private sector.

"The new deal must be that taxes are reduced to give individuals room to invest in themselves," Reform said.

It claimed that the record of Mr Blair and his government on the economy and public services was "mixed at best".

Less than half of children achieved five GCSEs at grades A*-C including English and maths, even though the exams had become easier.

The approach of the Government had been to centralise decision-making and to increase spending. This had led to waste.

The key trends of each of the Government's key public service measures - mortality rates, GCSE results and crime as measured by the British Crime Survey - "have been completely unchanged by the massive resources for each service".

Property crime has fallen, but much of this is a result of individual citizens improving their security. Sixty-three per cent of family cars now have an alarm, compared to 38 per cent in 1998.

Prison sentences for burglars have increased sharply, from around 16 months in 1994 to 25 months in 2005. But numbers of robberies and anti-social behaviour have remained high.

"This suggests that while a larger prison population and private spending has borne down on crime, the police have made little extra contribution," the report said.

Reform urged the next generation of political leaders to learn from the lessons of the Blair decade. But it said that Gordon Brown, who takes over today, had already suggested he wanted to raise spending on education by around £50 billion a year, equivalent to an extra 16p on the basic rate of tax.

Source: telegraph.co.uk

Please post any news stories about IVAs here:
http://www.iva.co.uk/forum/default.asp?CAT_ID=5

See my Blog:
http://ivanews.blogs.iva.co.uk
Please post any news stories about IVAs here:
http://www.iva.co.uk/forum/default.asp?CAT_ID=5

See my Blog:
http://ivanews.blogs.iva.co.uk
 
 

Welsh Boy

User avatar
Posts: 360
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:02 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Welsh Boy » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:32 pm
Once again a very informative read, I particularly take a lot of interest in the statistics that are being produced and those of you who regularly read on this site will know I have posted numerous times on the issue of education where finance is concerned, indeed it was my main issue at the successful debt evening that we attended recently in London. I sincerely believe that we are creating a minefield for our children and grandchildren and that debt aside there will be a huge problem in the provision of pension income in the future. But what can we do? I asked the question what would you change about the present system and some interesting points arose.**

Moving on to another point I have been reading the posts recently of Catullus (apologies if this is wrong ) and in particular today`s post at 10.22 wher Northern Rock have been directly named as a company not to go to if debt/loan consoidation was your aim. Catullus I have been wondering what you would bring to the table so to speak as I see you are in a very fortunate position, if you are an IP and I have no reason to doubt that I think you could personally lift the lid or dish the dirt on what`s going on in cases you come accross. Myself because I have gone public on who I am and my position within the regulated financial services arena cannot expose or give anything other than generic advice but you are able to do so,so I look forward to hopefully more case specific posts without obviously revealing any client details from you. Where do you see all this going?

** http://www.iva.co.uk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2167
added by admin
F.P.C. 1,2,3 Qualified
Financial Planning Certificate
CeMap Qualified
Whole of Market Mortgage Broker
Managing Director : Debt Advisory Bureau
Debt Advisory 4U
Principal : All Mortgage Products

Directly Authorised with FSA :304244
 
 

catullus

User avatar
Posts: 577
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:48 pm
Location:

Post by catullus » Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:58 pm
Welshboy

My last post before I go on leave.

Personally, I see things easing off over the next 6-12 months as far as concerns the negative attitude of lenders. Although they don't like IVA's, their real gripe is about the overselling of them and IP's fees, and I believe that progress is being made on both fronts,

The worst excesses of advertising (write off 100% of what you can't afford!!!!) have been curtailed by the ASA and I think a new fee protocol will soon be agreed which I think will significantly reduce the nominee fee and may even link fees to realisations (which I don't think is a good idea)

If our profession goes this far then I do think peace will break out and creditors will (slowly)become more supportive of IVA's.

Until then, we'll have to put up with the petty minded, bureaucratic, ill informed and erratic voting
policies of certain creditors who seem to accept no social responsibilty whatsover. Having said that I don't think IP's should be too smug about the position because much of the current uncertainty has been created by them.

And the latest good news is that Northern Rock appear to be signalling a withdrawal from the impaired unsecured debt market!
3 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to “Latest IVA News”