Extra income in IVA

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
5 posts Page 1 of 1
 
 

Lincoln_Guy

User avatar
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:06 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Lincoln_Guy » Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:36 am
Hi All,

Just got a quick query for you all, - I have always presumed that the seemingly common "you get to keep first 10% and 50% of the rest" rule applied to additional income in my IVA, however while looking through my proposal today I noticed that the only paragraphs which refer to extra income are:

8(5) You must inform the supervisor at any time that you are in receipt of additional income. You must come to a
satisfactory arrangement with the supervisor as to what increased amount should be paid into the arrangement. If
you do not do so you could become liable as detailed in paragraph 10(9).


And:

10(9) The supervisor on failure to reach agreement with you in respect of your obligation under paragraph 8(5) will
immediately issue a "certificate of non-compliance" unless the supervisor believes a further creditors meeting should
be held. Any such creditors meeting should be convened within 30 days of the supervisor's review of your annual
financial circumstances.


As I understand this, my contribution from any additional income is still negotiable, as there is no record of any exact figures recorded. Does this sound normal to people, and can people see any possible good/bad points about have a "loose" arrangement like this? Also, - is this common?

Cheers!
I owe, I owe, - so off to work I go...
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:40 am
That's a woolly clause which is open to misinterpretation!

If you do receive additional income, you must inform your IP of this and between the two of you decide how much your payments will increase to. I am sure that there will be a happy compromise somewhere along the way!
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

SometimesTina

User avatar
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:41 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by SometimesTina » Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:42 am
If its not regular income, I wouldn't worry. And if it is regular, make it not so!
Best Wishes,
Tina x


Even trannies get in debt
 
 

Lincoln_Guy

User avatar
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:06 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Lincoln_Guy » Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:02 pm
Thanks Melanie, - I must admit I was quite surprised at how nonsepecific that clause was, especially considering that my proposal was drafted by one of the largest firms, I would have thought that they would use a standardised proposal with watertight clauses to reduce potential negotiations further down the line!

Regards,

Dave.
I owe, I owe, - so off to work I go...
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:40 am
Use it to your advantage Dave - most IPs are not fans of any form of equity release at the end of the IVA, as this is often unachievable and just causes all of us more work which creditors do not want to pay for.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
5 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”