IP states that 85% LTV clause does not apply to the de-minimis clause ?

Get expert opinion. This is the place for new questions to be posted.
89 posts Page 5 of 6
 
 

Leese

User avatar
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 6:38 pm
Location:

Post by Leese » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:02 am
3.9) if the amount of equity available in the home at month 54 is under £5000, it is deminimise and does not need to be released & there will be no adjustment to the IVA term.

It's £5000 at 85% LTV. They wouldn't have added the part I have highlighted if it was 5k total equity as if it was 100% you couldn't release it anyway.

That's what I read from this anyway...
 
 

AlmostThere30

User avatar
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:26 pm
Location:

Post by AlmostThere30 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:42 am
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by Leese

3.9) if the amount of equity available in the home at month 54 is under £5000, it is deminimise and does not need to be released & there will be no adjustment to the IVA term.

It's £5000 at 85% LTV. They wouldn't have added the part I have highlighted if it was 5k total equity as if it was 100% you couldn't release it anyway.

That's what I read from this anyway...
Hubby just called for advice & was told...
Called Hb & I was given this example: an outstanding mortgage of £160 000 and a value of £163000 gives an equity of £3000, there is no amendment. The same mortgage on a house worth £166000 would give a £6000 equity. This is below 15% so can't be released hence they ask for an amendment to the term as there is equity just not enough to remortgage.
I have asked for that in writing and said when would an equity of less then £5000 be over 15% but he didn't have an answer to that.




So it seems we only have to have a £5000 equity & we will be extended :-(
 
 

villapb

User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:15 pm
Location:

Post by villapb » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:49 am
Got a letter this morning saying another variation meeting week Tuesday, all creditors made clear what the vote is for so hopefully go through ok......let you all..... know another week of wating
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:48 pm
That is indeed correct - but AlmostThere should seek advice directly from their own IP if they are in any way concerned about how these clauses will effect them.

Whilst these clauses may be somewhat overwhelming when reading through them, when they are illustrated by using actual figures they are a lot simpler to understand.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

AlmostThere30

User avatar
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:26 pm
Location:

Post by AlmostThere30 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:50 pm
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by MelanieGiles

That is indeed correct - but AlmostThere should seek advice directly from their own IP if they are in any way concerned about how these clauses will effect them.

Whilst these clauses may be somewhat overwhelming when reading through them, when they are illustrated by using actual figures they are a lot simpler to understand.
Hi Melanie,
Are we being told correctly then? That if we have £5k equity regardless of LTV we will need to be extended?
Karen
 
 

villapb

User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:15 pm
Location:

Post by villapb » Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:42 pm
Hi Karen, the best thing is forget the 5k the 2010 protocol clearly states that the debtor to be left with 15% equity...end off... no matter what some ip says, the 5k is meant to be a cushion so even after the 85%ltv there was say 3k releasable equity, but it wouldn't be worth doing as the ip would get it as fees not the creditor, so hence 5k came into play so that the creditor would have something after a re mortgage was done or what was the point.
85% ltv to realease over 5k in money or else forget it, plus you wont get a 85% mortgage anyway.........so extend 12 months upto the value of the releasable equity.
 
 

AlmostThere30

User avatar
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:26 pm
Location:

Post by AlmostThere30 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:49 pm
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by villapb

Hi Karen, the best thing is forget the 5k the 2010 protocol clearly states that the debtor to be left with 15% equity...end off... no matter what some ip says, the 5k is meant to be a cushion so even after the 85%ltv there was say 3k releasable equity, but it wouldn't be worth doing as the ip would get it as fees not the creditor, so hence 5k came into play so that the creditor would have something after a re mortgage was done or what was the point.
85% ltv to realease over 5k in money or else forget it, plus you wont get a 85% mortgage anyway.........so extend 12 months upto the value of the releasable equity.
Hi Villapb,
See this is where I am now confused again.
We called again today & asked for confirmation on what the clauses stated.
We were told regardless of LTV if we had £5k or more equity we would be extended by another year. (Because we wouldn't be able to remortgage. But surely anyone with an IVA will struggle to remortgage regardless of the equity??)
Our house is going to be borderline looking at surrounding houses hence why we are trying to gather the right information.
Karen
 
 

villapb

User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:15 pm
Location:

Post by villapb » Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:41 pm
Hi Karen so what u ip is asking is 100% ltv, which clearly is unfair to the debtor and not a fresh start, total joke tbh, our situation is looking ok now think we may have ours closed down next tuesday18th fingers crrossrd
 
 

AlmostThere30

User avatar
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:26 pm
Location:

Post by AlmostThere30 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:43 pm
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by villapb

Hi Karen so what u ip is asking is 100% ltv, which clearly is unfair to the debtor and not a fresh start, total joke tbh, our situation is looking ok now think we may have ours closed down next tuesday18th fingers crrossrd
It looks that way, but nothing I can do about it :-(
 
 

villapb

User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:15 pm
Location:

Post by villapb » Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:58 pm
Karen don't give in, i have fought for six months, tell them u not agreeing to extension and ask them who is requlator, also you want a face to face with supervisor not the admin, say u want to go bankrupt soon change tune when no equity it will cost them all their fees to date,
 
 

villapb

User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:15 pm
Location:

Post by villapb » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:01 pm
Never give in that's what they want
 
 

AlmostThere30

User avatar
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:26 pm
Location:

Post by AlmostThere30 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:02 pm
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by villapb

Karen don't give in, i have fought for six months, tell them u not agreeing to extension and ask them who is requlator, also you want a face to face with supervisor not the admin, say u want to go bankrupt soon change tune when no equity it will cost them all their fees to date,
They know we can't go bankrupt due to hubby's job so I can't threaten them with that!
We signed the forms so surely we can't now argue them. We should've questioned it before signing.
Guess time will tell after valuation on Wednesday, but we seem to be borderline.
Karen.
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:05 pm
Which IP firm are you with Karen?
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
 
 

AlmostThere30

User avatar
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:26 pm
Location:

Post by AlmostThere30 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:09 pm
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by MelanieGiles

Which IP firm are you with Karen?
Hi Melanie,
Harrington Brooks.
Karen.
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:14 pm
Thanks Karen

The spirit of the IVA protocol means that if the sum to be raised from the potential re-mortgage - subject to you not borrowing more than 85% of the value of your property, then it is deminimis and there is then no need to raise any money or extend the term of the IVA.

Please get your IP to confirm that this is how they interpret the ruling. If they do not, then you may need to take this matter further.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
89 posts Page 5 of 6
Return to “Ask IVA Forum and Industry experts”