Does anyone know when this is happening? I know the thought was March. Not that I have agreed, but interested to see what happens if anyone doesn't mind letting us know.
Exactly!
I found the article online that clearly states her being fined, how much and what for.
I drafted an rmail clearly stating we refuse but never sent it as their letter says if agree sign and return their letter.
We didnt sign or return so they have nothing from us agreeing to new t&cs.
I asked them several questions, including when the meeting was taking place, what was the deadline for our responses (the sort of thing the letter should have covered!) and then told them I wasn't interested.
With over 900 transfers they are going to have to be very careful about who they put forward; knowing their track record it'll be easy to make an error
mVM
I have been informed by one of my creditors that a MVM was taking place yesterday for all the new transferred accounts from Mel ... I turned down the new TC by email but according to the creditor they have still sent him all the documentation in regards to the new TCs that is required for the MVM asking for him to agree !!!! Are CF allowed to change the TC if creditors agree and I disagree ?
This is what I don't understand - is it almost like an election with the majority wins.
IVA started March 2011, Completed March 2016 and certificate issued 11 days after final payment. It was not always easy but then some of the best decisions aren't.
I had an email response saying I was being removed from the MVM process after I turned down the new T&C's.
I worked out that with the retrospective fee increase almost 8 of my final 12 monthly payments would have been kept by CF as fees. That, I felt, was outrageous and unjustifiable.
I only know about the MVM from here. I turned the new t&cs down verbally, and was told that a note had been put on my file and that was fine. I'm hoping that means I won't be included, however your post, Can, does worry me. I didn't think they could put forward the new t&cs if we don't agree. With 900 plus cases, are they really going to be able to separate the yes and nos? If the meeting was yesterday, is the result a matter for public record?
