font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by ashb
Crazy
Your dead right this is what I have been saying, we borrowed the money so it should all be paid back rather than trying to use excuses to avoid paying this back- no morales !!!!
Read what I'm saying a little more carefully...
I'm not saying that debtors should keep it all. I'm saying that the issue of any 'assets' should be addressed within the term of the IVA.
Let us not forget that whilst the money we borrowed was borrowed legitimately and lawfully, the money taken from debtors for PPI was acquired illegally and hence them being made to pay it back. I don't see why creditors should, after the fact, benefit from their own illegal actions.
Where is the punitive element if they're simply allowed to take back what they stole in the first place (for that's what it is - obtaining money by deception).
I can see both sides of the argument; I also firmly believe that there are people in IVAs today who wouldn't be in one if they hadn't had tens of thousands of pounds of PPI money taken from them without their knowledge or consent.
I also think that the assumption of IPs that any PPI was taken without the debtors' knowledge needs to be addressed. Debtors are only entitled to a refund of the PPI if they were not aware it had been added on.