Letter from Debtmatters saying IVA moved

21 posts Page 2 of 2
 
 

joh71262

User avatar
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:05 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by joh71262 » Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:23 am
Are they legally within their rights to demand more money for fees though ? Surely once the work has already been done and the annual reviews take place as normal, they can't ask for any further contributions for their own pockets ???
There's light at the end of the tunnel - it's just that sometimes the tunnel seems so long.

IVA Complete June 2009
 
 

ianmillington

User avatar
Posts: 1331
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:07 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by ianmillington » Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:46 am
If the Supervisor at any time finds the fees inadequate, he can call a meeting of creditors to sanction an increase. This would be a variation, requiring a majority in excess of 75% (in value) of those creditors who vote.

As discussed above, however, the fee is only one of the reasons for which they might be seeking a variation.

Ian
Ian Millington
Insolvency Director
PDHL Ltd (formerly Personal Debt Helpline Ltd)
www.pdhl.co.uk
 
 

joh71262

User avatar
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:05 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by joh71262 » Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:05 pm
But would they take that money from the agreed sum or would they demand it from the person paying the debt ?
There's light at the end of the tunnel - it's just that sometimes the tunnel seems so long.

IVA Complete June 2009
 
 

ianmillington

User avatar
Posts: 1331
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:07 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by ianmillington » Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:21 pm
Out of the pot, so the creditors get less, hence the variation.

So far as you are concerned the deal is the deal and won't change (unless you can't afford the contributions in which case you would ask the Supervisor to propose a variation [:)]).

Ian
Ian Millington
Insolvency Director
PDHL Ltd (formerly Personal Debt Helpline Ltd)
www.pdhl.co.uk
 
 

lauren.f

User avatar
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:19 pm
Location:

Post by lauren.f » Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:10 pm
Please read my forum - read your terms, i personally would not sign, they want more money from you and to extend your agreement
baz36 wrote:

Received letter today from Debtmatters saying that they have undertaken a strategic review of the business and as a result they will no longer continue to supervise our arrangement, and they have arranged for our case to be transferred to a company called Payplan.

Its says the transfer was approved by the high court on 20th Feb. It says payplan will be writing to us over the next few days to let us have new contact details.

Is this all anything to be concerned about? Does our orginal terms and conditions still apply? our chairman's report etc etc.....

Just a little concerned, are they any good????
 
 

MelanieGiles

User avatar
Industry Expert
Posts: 47612
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:42 am
Location:

Post by MelanieGiles » Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:37 pm
Nobody is being asked to pay any more money - unless they are in arrears, in which case it is suggested that the arrangement be extended for up to twelve months to enable those missed payments to be paid.
Regards, Melanie Giles, Insolvency Practitioner
21 posts Page 2 of 2
Return to “postings for march”