I too would be interested in seeing the Statement of Affairs appended to the proposals.
Unless I am mistaken on this point, your IP should have declared in the proposal and Nominee's Report what you have paid to him prior to the meeting and further it should be declared how those funds have been utilised.
It may well be that the proposal reflects that the Nominee's Fee has been paid prior to the meeting of creditors from those funds you have paid, in which case the Statement of Affairs will possibly show only Supervisor's Remuneration as being deductible from funds paid post meeting.
Check the modifications to your proposals too. If the monies paid to Debt Free Direct were properly disclosed in the proposal and Nominee's Report, it is possible that your creditors would have sought to modify the proposal to the effect that funds paid to the Nominee prior to the meeting should be introduced in to the arrangement net of the Nominee's Fee. So say you had paid £2,500 pre meeting and the Nominee's fee was £2,350, the R & P should reflect payment in to your arrangement of £150 balance.
It's sales patter when they say a service is free. It's not free, far from it. Any engagement letter you received from Debt Free would outline the charging structure used. It's only free in that you, yourself, are not making any additional payments above those in the arrangement in respect of fees. Fees are deducted from those contributions.
As suggested above, you should seek clarification from the IP as to precisely what has happened to those monies you have paid to him prior to the meeting of creditors.
If you do not get a satisfactory answer, let us know ... I personally would then suggest that in the absence of adequate explantion, you ask the IP's licensing body to seek clarification on this point on your behalf.
Tell it like it is.
Tell it like it is.