font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by chocoholic2
Recovering - in the link you posted Michael Peoples comment is the one that concerns me most, his advice is usually spot on, and full of common sense, and for him to say we should not automatically expect a 12mths extension is quite worrying..
My IVA agreement has three possible outcomes should there be any equity in my property over £5,000. One is to attempt to remortgage, the second is to extend payments for 12 months and the third is for a third party to provide the money. At no point is a secured loan mentioned and there's no way I would be taking one out. I will abide 100% to the agreement I and my creditors have signed - nothing more, nothing less. My IVA shows January 2008 revision so I'm on the older one.
font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:<hr height="1" noshade>Originally posted by Credit-King
I feel for you guys with mortgages, it must be awful to come to the end of your IVA only to be bolted up with a secured loan for X number of years. I had a courtesy call from credit fix over the red letters & they mentioned I could confirm over the phone to agree to the new Ts & Cs so be careful what you say if you talk with them.
I would be gobsmacked if such a variation could be agreed verbally over the phone and without any documentation. I would agree though, be VERY careful about what is said over the phone. Assume all calls are recorded and that anything you say could be used against you.
One other thing to consider; could agreeing to the variation requested by Credit Fix also stitch us up by including the 2014 revisions to terminology and the inclusion of a secured loan as an option at the end of the term?
I am ****ing livid that I'm worrying about this near-permanently. I've gone from being happy that I'm making good inroads into my IVA to feeling like it's now trench warfare with an unscrupulous bunch of cowboys.
It felt like Mel genuinely had our interests at heart (and as she represented us, so she should) but that Credit Fix will not hesitate to hang us out to dry if it earns them a few quid more.
I don't know why Mel ditched us but I hope she can't sleep at night knowing she's cast 900 good people to the CF wolves. I've just been re-reading the original letter:
"...it became evident that the best solution was to transfer cases to an operation who were not just set up to deliver and meet your needs, but who also carried the same professional standards and high regards for its clients.
We understand that you may be initially concerned as to how this may affect you moving forward, but please be assured that Susan and her colleagues at Credit Fix share our own values and business ethics.."
Yeah, right. The most gracious I can be toward Melanie right now is that perhaps she had the wool pulled over her eyes by Credit Fix. I simply can't match up the statement about their supposedly PJG-esque conduct, ethics and treatment of clients with what we're finding now we've been sold up the river.